7-2 Module Seven Program Critique

Read Rubric Verbatim

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

 

What to Submit

Your submission should be a 2- to 3-page Word document. Also include a title page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. You should include a minimum of two sources. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

Sidhu et al. BMC Health Services Research (2015) 15:54
DOI 10.1186/s12913-015-0712-8

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access

A critique of the design, implementation, and
delivery of a culturally-tailored self-management
education intervention: a qualitative evaluation
Manbinder S Sidhu1*, Nicola K Gale2, Paramjit Gill1, Tom Marshall1 and Kate Jolly3

  • Abstract
  • Background
  • : Self-management education is at the forefront of addressing the increasing prevalence of chronic
    diseases. For those at greatest risk, such as minority-ethnic and/or socio-economically deprived groups, self-management
    education can be culturally-tailored to encourage behavioural change. Yet, the application of culturally appropriate
    material and expertise within health promotion services continues to be debated. We critique the design,
    implementation, and delivery of a culturally-tailored self-management intervention, with particular focus on
    the experiences of lay educators.

  • Methods
  • : A mixed methods qualitative evaluation was undertaken to understand self-management service
    provision to culturally diverse communities (i.e. how components such as lay workers, group-based design,
    and culturally-appropriate educational material are intended to encourage behavioural change). We interviewed lay
    educators delivering the Chronic Disease Educator programme along with attendees, whilst observing workshops. Data
    were thematically analysed using a content-based constant comparison approach through a number of interpretative
    analytical stages.

  • Results
  • : Lay educators felt part of the local community, relating to attendees from different races and ethnicities.
    However, lay educators faced challenges when addressing health beliefs and changing lifestyle practices.
    Culturally-tailored components aided communication, with educator’s cultural awareness leading to close relationships
    with attendees, while the group-based design facilitated discussions of the emotional impact of illness.

  • Conclusion
  • s: Lay educators bring with them a number of nuanced skills and knowledge when delivering
    self-management education. The development and training required for this role is inhibited by financial
    constraints at policy-level. The interpretation of being from the ‘community’ links with the identity and status of
    the lay role, overlapping notions of race, ethnicity, and language.

    Keywords: Self-management, Education, Ethnicity, Lay, Culture

    Background
    Migrant populations are at greater risk of developing
    and living with long term conditions than the general
    population [1]. Further, migrant groups practice fewer
    self-management behaviours and demonstrate higher
    utilisation of emergency healthcare services in compari-
    son to the general population [2]. One method to ad-
    dress the growing demand for health care services is by

    * Correspondence: m.s.sidhu@bham.ac.uk
    1Primary Care Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston,
    Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
    Full list of author information is available at the end of the article

    © 2015 Sidhu et al.; licensee BioMed Central. T
    Commons Attribution License (http://creativec
    reproduction in any medium, provided the or
    Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.or
    unless otherwise stated.

    improving patients’ ability to self-manage by attending
    chronic disease self-management programmes (CDSMPs).
    Following a model developed by Lorig et al. [3] for pa-
    tients living with arthritis, CDSMPs are weekly, group-
    based workshops delivered in primary care or community
    settings. Theoretically, CDSMPs intend to improve inter-
    action with health care providers, making self-care deci-
    sions, managing the physical and emotional aspects of
    living with a chronic illness, and re-interpreting rela-
    tionships with close others [4].
    CDSMPs employ lay people (non-health professionals)

    from the ‘community’. In this context, lay people may be

    his is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
    ommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
    iginal work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain
    g/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article,

    mailto:m.s.sidhu@bham.ac.uk

    http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

    http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Sidhu et al. BMC Health Services Research (2015) 15:54 Page 2 of 11

    living with chronic diseases, have received self-management
    training, have knowledge of cultural beliefs and practices
    as well as societal issues facing the community. Within
    the UK Kennedy et al. [5], with their evaluation of the
    Expert Patients Programme (EPP), reported white, middle
    class, women are, particularly, attracted to volunteer lay
    positions as a method of accessing employment in the
    health care sector. Health policy has encouraged lay per-
    son recruitment according to ethnic concordance [6] and/
    or addressing language concerns. What remains inconclu-
    sive is how ‘being from the community’ enhances the
    experiences of those attending CDSMPs, and ultimately,
    encourage behaviour change in comparison to lay educa-
    tors recruited elsewhere.
    Cultural adaptation refers to the extent to which ethnic/

    cultural characteristics, experiences, values, behavioural
    patterns and beliefs of a target population as well as rele-
    vant historical, environmental and social factors are incor-
    porated in the design, delivery, and evaluation of targeted
    health promotion materials and programs [7]. There re-
    mains a lack of evidence to guide practitioners on how
    best to culturally adapt interventions. Zeh et al. [8] have
    identified a number of cultural barriers for minority
    groups living with diabetes, where services need to address
    linguistic differences, different beliefs about health and ill-
    ness, as well as addressing low concordance patients may
    have with western professional advice. Notably, Greenhalgh
    et al. [9] identified that among Sikh, Hindu and Muslim
    groups self-management was secondary to adhering to re-
    ligious beliefs. However, some cultural barriers are more
    specific to certain ethnic groups and grouping all ethnic
    groups together, in terms of their health service needs,
    may be contentious [10].
    Services are culturally tailored using five main strat-

    egies described by Kreuter and Wray [11]. These are:
    peripheral strategies (designing materials to appeal to a
    given group e.g. visual information); evidential strategies
    (presenting epidemiological evidence to raise awareness
    of health concerns), linguistic strategies (delivering in
    the dominant or native language of the target group),
    constituent-involving strategies (drawing on the experi-
    ence of the group which includes hiring members of the
    indigenous population); and sociocultural strategies (dis-
    cussing health-related issues in the context of broader
    social and/or cultural values).
    These five main strategies for cultural tailoring fit

    within two broad categories with regard to adaptations
    that can be potentially used for interventions designed
    for minority-ethnic communities. First, cultural adapta-
    tion (adapting delivery or tailoring health information to
    reflect community values, beliefs, and practices); second,
    structural (modifying the intervention to encourage at-
    tendance and completion). The differentiation allows
    for the possibility to target specific components, where

    cultural adaptations relate to the nature of the content
    provided, and structural adaptations focus on issues of
    implementation. In addition, data collection with multi-
    ethnic populations can be problematic, as traditional
    ‘written’ methods are suited to the White population,
    whereas some South Asian sub-groups requiring assist-
    ance or audio delivery [12].
    We evaluated a local service serving an ethnically di-

    verse socio-economically disadvantaged inner city com-
    munity. Our objectives were to i) describe the experiences
    of lay educators educating members of their own com-
    munity with regard to self-management and ii) evaluate
    whether a culturally tailored self-management interven-
    tion is delivered as intended to an ethnically diverse
    population through observation and interpreting the
    views of completers.

    Methods
    Study design
    To describe the experiences of lay educators and critique
    components of design, implementation, and delivery we
    undertook a theoretically-guided service evaluation. The
    objective was to evaluate whether components led to
    intended outcomes. For example, the group-based design
    is intended to enhance peer-to-peer exchanges amongst
    attendees, the application of visual aids and interactive
    tasks is expected to familiarise participants with low liter-
    acy, while lay educators are assumed to have greater
    knowledge of health beliefs and practices that can act as
    potential barriers to healthy living.
    A qualitative approach was well suited to our evalu-

    ation, because qualitative methods can document and
    interpret the experiences of delivering and attending a
    self-management service. We collected both observa-
    tional and interview data to gain multiple perspectives
    on the service. Semi structured interviews were conducted
    to understand lay educator’s experiences of delivering the
    intervention to an ethnically diverse population. We ob-
    served workshops delivered by each lay educator. Work-
    shops varied considerably by: content, language in which
    content was delivered, and the characteristics of partici-
    pants in a single group (ethnicity, gender, literacy needs).
    Therefore, it was imperative that as many different
    sessions were observed to interpret the various styles
    of delivery. Semi structured interviews were conducted
    with participants who had completed the intervention
    (attended at least 3 out of 4 workshops). Interviews were
    aimed at collecting data regarding participant experience
    and their views of lay educators.

    Setting
    The intervention was delivered in Birmingham, UK. Ac-
    cording to Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF)
    data for April 2010- March 2011, for the local vicinity in

    Sidhu et al. BMC Health Services Research (2015) 15:54 Page 3 of 11

    which the intervention was delivered (74 practices, with
    321 456 patients registered) the prevalence of CHD,
    diabetes mellitus, CKD were similar or greater than na-
    tional levels.

    Intervention
    The characteristics of lay educators/attendees inter-
    viewed and a description of the intervention are pre-
    sented in Tables 1 and 2. We have used the Abraham
    and Michie [13] taxonomy to describe behaviour change
    techniques used within the intervention. The Chronic
    Disease Educator (CDE) programme was first delivered
    in March 2008 within general practitioner (GP) practices
    and community settings in Birmingham, UK. The inter-
    vention was delivered by a community interest company
    (CIC), providing lay health services to the local popula-
    tion. Patients suffering from diabetes mellitus (DM), cor-
    onary heart disease (CHD) and/or chronic kidney disease
    (CKD) were invited to attend.
    The intervention was culturally-tailored and differed

    from the CDSMP model developed by Lorig et al. [14].

    Table 1 Characteristics of participants interviewed/observed

    Characteristic Lay educators (N) Attendees (N)

    Gender

    Male 2 11

    Female 4 9

    Ethnicity

    White British 1 7

    White Other – 1

    Asian- Indian – 5

    Asian- Pakistani 2 1

    Asian- Bangladeshi 1 2

    Black Caribbean 1 4

    Mixed Race- White British
    and Black Caribbean

    1 –

    Age

    Up to 29 years 4 –

    30-39 years 2 –

    40-49 years – 4

    50-59 years – 3

    60-69 years – 10

    70 or older – 3

    Language

    Bi-lingual 3 17

    Non-Bi-lingual 3 3

    Years since diagnosis

    Less than 5 years – 7

    5-10 years – 4

    10 years or more – 9

    The service was delivered over four weeks, once a week
    for 90 minutes each time, by a single lay educator. Partici-
    pants were allocated to groups (3–15 people) according
    to language requirements, with non-English-speaking
    participants (exclusively South Asian individuals) allo-
    cated to groups with a bi-lingual lay educator (Punjabi,
    Urdu, Hindi or Sylheti) or if a bi-lingual educator was
    unavailable, an interpreter with necessary language
    skills was used. Participants were referred to the
    programme by GPs, practice nurses, practice staff or lay
    educators.
    Content included information on weight management,

    choosing healthier foods, meal planning, physical activ-
    ity, checking and improving metabolic control and pre-
    venting complications associated with chronic diseases.
    The programme content was underpinned by social
    learning theory [15] and included skills mastery, action
    planning, social support (via the group), goal setting,
    and problem solving. To accommodate participants from
    socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds with low
    literacy levels the programme used visual aids and dem-
    onstrations, understandable terminology, and was deliv-
    ered in community locations.

    Fidelity of the intervention
    Lay educators were provided with a ‘manual’ detailing
    the aims, content, and goals that should be completed in
    each workshop of the intervention. For example, lay
    educators were expected to inform attendees of the aim
    at the beginning of each workshop. Lay educators were
    assessed on: whether there was group interaction be-
    tween participants and educators, use of appropriate cul-
    tural adaptations for the demographic characteristics of
    the participants, appropriate translation, supporting self-
    efficacy, setting goals and reviewing progress against
    targets.

    Recruiting lay people from the community
    Lay educators were recruited from the local community.
    These were people from different ethnic communities,
    who lived in Birmingham and had knowledge of local
    social issues. At the beginning of data collection six lay
    educators were delivering the programme. Training was
    provided in partnership with a local college, with lay ed-
    ucators completing a national vocational qualification in
    health and social care.

    Sample
    All six lay educators agreed to be interviewed. A purpos-
    ive sampling method was used with regards to observing
    the CDE programme and generating a sample of partici-
    pants that completed the intervention [16]. All sessions
    (workshops 1–4) were observed for a single bi-lingual
    and mono-lingual educator, while the first and last

    Table 2 Description of the chronic disease educator intervention

    Reporting criteria CDE Programme

    Where was the intervention delivered and why? Primary care settings (GP surgeries) and community settings with a single lay
    educator (or with the use of interpreters when necessary

    What behavioural change theory has intervention been based
    on (if any)?

    Social learning theory

    What behaviour change techniques were used by people
    delivering the intervention (if any)*?

    1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 19, 22, 24

    A description of the activities and material provided in each
    workshop and their intended outcomes?

    Material: information on weight management, choosing healthier foods, meal
    planning, physical exercise, checking and improving metabolic control and
    preventing complications.

    Activities: participants taking each other’s blood pressure, BMI calculations,
    understanding sugar and salt content in foods, Eat-well plate, food maps, guided
    imagery, ‘freethink’.

    Intended outcomes: desirable body weight, learn to shop for food, increase physical
    activity, take medication properly and regularly, recognise early symptoms of
    condition, regularly attend clinics, improved symptom control, reduced BMI,
    improved quality of life and knowledge of condition, reduced level of prescribing,
    slower disease progression, management of condition, carry out normal roles and
    activities, and manage emotional impact of illness.

    What support (if any) was provided to individuals outside of
    workshops?

    No contact outside of workshops.

    Was a manual or protocol used to deliver the intervention
    and are there details on how it can be accessed?

    Manual is available to lay educators, however, not used during intervention. Can be
    accessed via permission from Health Exchange.

    How were individuals referred to the programme? Patients suffering from diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease and/or chronic
    kidney disease were invited to attend the programme. Patients referred to the
    programme by general practitioners, practice nurses or practice staff. Practices citing
    a lack of time asked CDEs to contact patients on chronic disease registers directly by
    phone or postal mail.

    Were any cultural or structural adaptations used? Delivery in various languages, cultural adaptation of educational material, application
    of visual aids and demonstrations, understandable terminology, emotional well-
    being, culturally sensitive approach to delivery, recruitment of lay personnel, delivery
    in community locations, and religious/cultural acknowledgement.

    *Abraham and Michie [13] Taxonomy of behaviour change techniques:
    1. Provide general information on behaviour-health link; 2. Provide information on consequences; 3. Provide information about others’ approval; 4.Prompt intention
    formation; 5. Prompt barrier identification; 6. Provide general encouragement; 7. Set graded tasks; 8. Provide instruction; 9.Model/Demonstrate the behaviour; 10. Prompt
    specific goal setting; 11. Prompt review of behavioural goals; 12. Prompt self-monitoring of behaviour; 13. Provide feedback on performance; 14. Provide
    contingent rewards; 15. Teach to use prompts/cues; 16. Agree behavioural contract; 17. Prompt practice; 18. Use of follow-up prompts; 19. Provide opportunities
    for social comparison; 20. Plan social support/social change; 21.Prompt identification as role model/position advocate; 22. Prompt self-talk; 23. Relapse prevention;
    24. Stress management; 25. Motivational interviewing; 26. Time management.

    Sidhu et al. BMC Health Services Research (2015) 15:54 Page 4 of 11

    workshops were observed for the remaining educators.
    We observed workshops delivered in various community
    languages, to men and women, and to different ethnic
    groups to understand the acceptability of the intervention
    for different sub-groups. Completers of the programme
    invited for interviews were purposively sampled by ethni-
    city. In order to ascertain whether the intervention was
    delivered as intended we wished to gather the views of
    participants completing the intervention, to identify
    what they felt was positive or could be improved about
    the intervention, with regard to content and delivery,
    for future service users. Lay educators asked participants
    attending workshops whether they would like to be inter-
    viewed and share their views about the intervention.

    Data collection
    MS completed semi-structured interviews with lay educa-
    tors (N = 6) and a sample of participants who completed

    the CDE programme (N = 20). MS is a sociologist by back-
    ground (BA Hons at the time of data collection). Inter-
    views with lay educators were conducted at their place of
    work, while interviews with participants took place in
    their homes or a meeting room at the Central Library,
    Birmingham. All interviews were completed by MS. An
    interview guide was used (different for lay educators and
    participants,

  • Additional files
  • 1 and 2), based on a review
    of the literature and discussions within the research team
    (MS, NG and KJ). With reference to the work of Brown
    et al. [17] and Tozer et al. [18], the interview guide was
    structured about the lay educator role, its responsibilities,
    training and the experience of being and working within
    the local community. The interview guide for participants
    was thematically designed incorporating questions about
    style of facilitation, meeting cultural/language needs, ap-
    plication of behavioural change techniques, and delivery
    of content. A key focus was placed on understanding the

    Sidhu et al. BMC Health Services Research (2015) 15:54 Page 5 of 11

    interactions amongst participants during group based
    education and whether this method was acceptable for at-
    tendees. Data collection ceased when no new descriptive
    themes were emerging from interviews. All interviews
    were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim. Three inter-
    views with participants were in Punjabi or Urdu and one
    conducted with an interpreter and transcribed in English
    (Bengali speaker). Translation was independently checked
    for conceptual equivalence by another researcher with ap-
    propriate language skills.
    To develop an understanding of the CDE programme

    we observed educational workshops (N = 14 [workshops]).
    MS observed all sessions. There were three areas evalu-
    ated for fidelity: observing the nature of interactions be-
    tween participants with each other and educators, the
    approach and language (literally and conceptually) used
    by educators, and whether cultural and social norms (in
    relation to healthy living) were addressed. The role of
    observer as participant (the researcher has minimal
    interaction in the research setting) was chosen [19].
    Observational data were recorded using a thematically-
    designed research instrument categorised into programme
    delivery and participant interaction. The instrument
    (Additional file 3), designed by the research team, was
    developed to collect data with regard to group dynam-
    ics, behavioural change techniques, variation in lan-
    guage used, delivery styles and cultural competency of
    lay educators.

    Data analysis
    Data analysis occurred in tandem with data collection.
    MS conducted and transcribed all interviews (English
    and non-English) and recorded data from observations.
    Transcriptions of non-English interviews were verified
    for conceptual equivalence with another researcher within
    the university with experience of conducting interviews in
    South Asian languages. With regard to reliability, a pur-
    posive sample of transcripts was independently coded by
    NG (medical sociologist). The intention was to independ-
    ently identify areas of interest within data that could lead
    to the generation of themes. Monthly (NG and KJ) and bi-
    annual meetings (PG and TM) to discuss the generation
    of themes were held to increase methodological rigour
    [20]. Using a constant comparison approach, we used
    applied thematic analysis via an inductive process. We
    used content analysis and themes emerged from the
    data inductively. In an attempt to be systematic
    throughout, our coding was completed in a number of
    cycles, iteratively moving back and forth between data
    collection and analysis.
    First cycle coding involved reading transcripts [and ob-

    servational data], identifying data of interest and encoding
    prior to interpretation [21]; hence, codes were created that
    “summarize, synthesise, and sort many observations made

    of the data” ([22]: 112). Once complete, the second cycle
    involved the application of axial coding; placing relating
    codes together that are based on a single phenomenon
    and making connections. Throughout axial coding, we
    adopted a technique of writing brief analytical memos to
    detail the development of categories, make relationships
    between codes, facilitating theoretical interpretation, and
    linking findings with the literature. Finally, themes were
    generated by writing initial descriptive themes, then clus-
    tering themes together to generate an inductive deduced
    integrative theme. NVivo software was used to assist data
    analysis.

    Consent and ethical issues
    Ethical approval was obtained from South Birmingham
    Research Ethics Committee. Participants were given
    written information about the evaluation and gave writ-
    ten informed consent. Quotes have been given identifiers
    to ensure anonymity.

    Results
    Findings: Lay educators
    A table of themes and supporting quotes are attached at
    the end of the manuscript (Additional file 4).

    Cultural receptivity
    Lay educators interpreted themselves as knowledgeable
    experts, where knowledge and information they dissemi-
    nated was perceived to be of greater value compared to
    health beliefs held by participants on the programme. Par-
    ticipants were allowed to discuss their health beliefs; how-
    ever, discussions were concluded by distinguishing whether
    a belief was ‘fact’ (conformed to scientific-based evidence)
    or ‘myth’ (related to folk beliefs). This was complemented
    by participants placing greater value on information given
    by lay educators, particularly about healthy foods, in com-
    parison to other members of the group:

    They just ask me, “is this true, is this true”, I go this is
    what’s true and some are myths, so try not to follow
    the myths just the facts (CDE, interview).

    Their [White British and Black/Black Caribbean]
    mentality is slightly different to the Asian culture so
    you know they don’t eat many spices anyway, their
    lifestyles, their little habits. I find that’s its easier for
    them to make the changes than it is of Asian people
    because they just have their set plans you know, you
    make one dish and you have it twice a day, and
    everybody has the same and you have your chapattis
    (CDE, interview).

    Cultural adaptations were made, in their majority, to
    meet the needs of South Asian participants attending

    Sidhu et al. BMC Health Services Research (2015) 15:54 Page 6 of 11

    the programme. Activities were adapted by incorporating
    established Asian brands when discussing cooking prac-
    tices and nutritional value. Female only groups were de-
    livered for Muslim participants on request:

    We show them the traffic light system, like types of
    food, so instead of using English brands I use Asian
    brands, like East End (CDE, interview).

    if it was Muslim women, sometimes they prefer a
    women only group so you have to be sensitive to that
    (CDE, interview).

    The activities on the CDE programme were culturally
    adapted to include visual aids for illiterate and/or poorly
    educated participants to get across the message of
    healthy eating. Visual aids were not always applicable to
    certain ethnic groups, where they would be more useful
    if they were culturally orientated to meet particular
    needs for individual communities:

    the visual aids aren’t culturally relevant, like with the
    food plate the oils and fats that we’ve got, even the
    bits of salt aren’t culturally relevant… the oils we
    purchased from an outside agency, the salt’s again
    have been purchased by an outside agency as well, so
    it’s what they provide (CDE, interview).

    Working with and without interpreters
    The need to establish a productive working relationship
    between lay educator and interpreter was imperative,
    particularly to ascertain that their roles did not overlap.
    Mono-lingual educators recognised the importance inter-
    preters played when there was no ethnic concordance
    with participants. As interpreters were ethnically matched
    with participants, they acted as a link and helped to break
    any perceived barriers of us and them:

    The interpreter that I work [with], they (South Asian
    community) really value her, they do, I suppose
    they’re also seen as part of her community as well. Us
    working alongside together has been, very positive. I
    suppose it has broken down perhaps a barrier that
    may have been between me and the group in a way, if
    that was ever felt (CDE, interview).

    For South Asian bi-lingual educators (N = 3), speaking
    a second language provided the opportunity to apply
    contextual knowledge about beliefs, practices and experi-
    ences of living with chronic diseases. However, being eth-
    nically, rather than linguistically matched, with members
    of the South Asian community resulted in a number of
    difficulties. There were issues with multiple community
    languages being spoken in a single workshop:

    I have to be very strict and say I’m going to do a
    language only course, cause it’s very hard to chop and
    change, we tried it and it doesn’t work…cause it
    would be a lot easier delivering it in a community
    language than it is delivering half in a community
    language then in English and back into a community
    language, cause people just get frustrated, they get
    tired (CDE, interview).

    Lay educators were faced with the experience of deal-
    ing with practices that were culturally ingrained while
    simultaneously delivering health information that was
    medically validated. Therefore, there were difficulties
    trying to translate health education messages designed
    for western lifestyles for South Asian communities:

    It’s quite tiring because working with Asian people is
    a challenge, because I find it very challenging, because
    it’s a very tough community to work with and
    especially trying to send out the message that we
    want, because they’re so set in their ways (CDE,
    interview).

    Being ‘from the community’ addresses surface level
    cultural needs such as establishing clear lines of commu-
    nication through a single language. Conversely, validated
    health education messages based on western diets and
    lifestyles were difficult to translate and considered cul-
    turally irrelevant which led educators to adapt content
    to fit participant lifestyles:

    they’ve all got their individual problems, for example
    Jamaican’s they tend to use a lot of salt on their salt
    fish and everything, you’ve got Asian’s with the fat
    and the ghee [clarified butter] (CDE, interview).

    Findings: observations for fidelity
    Use of appropriate cultural adaptations
    Visual aids were perceived to be valuable when educat-
    ing South Asian members of the group. The CDEs felt
    that, in general, South Asian people in their groups had
    lower baseline knowledge of the content provided on the
    programme compared to people from White British and
    Black Caribbean communities. For example, CDEs would
    first explain what the different food groups are before ac-
    tivities using a food mat or food traffic light system were
    carried out with South Asian participants. The use of vis-
    ual aids was able to make the ‘take home message’ of the
    activities much clearer and easy to understand for mem-
    bers of this group:

    The use of the visual aids (images of food portions
    and the sugar bags- identifying how much sugar is in
    different types of food) makes a considerable impact

    Sidhu et al. BMC Health Services Research (2015) 15:54 Page 7 of 11

    on providing a complete picture and makes the
    content very relevant. PT (1) responds in English,
    “My God”- PT (5) responds in Punjabi and English
    combined when she sees a picture of some ice cream,
    “bhoort tasty” [very tasty]- CDE picks up image and
    replies that it is very sugary and unhealthy- PT (1)
    takes sugar bag- PT (3) in Urdu, “herani”
    [shocked/amazed] (CDE, observational notes).

    Setting goals and reviewing progress against targets
    Goal setting was primarily performed at the end of the
    intervention (week 4) rather than setting goals in each
    session based on the content covered. Furthermore, goal
    setting was vague and non-personalised; for example,
    encouraging participants to lose weight but not distin-
    guishing how much weight to lose and over what length
    of time. Food diaries were inappropriately used on the
    programme. Rather than identifying potential areas for
    change in a participant’s diet they were seen as a tool that
    could be used by individuals in isolation. Therefore, food
    diaries highlight a potential area where personalised be-
    havioural changes can be made with the help of the CDE:

    No recap of the previous week- all participants
    present in this session were present in the previous
    session- PT 3,6,8,9,13 bring their food dairies to the
    session- CDE does have a look at these diaries, however,
    gives the diaries back to them, “it’s for you guys to use
    really”. Some appear to think that it was bit of a useless
    task, maybe wished to gain more feedback from the
    CDE; advice on where changes could be made, more
    knowledge and guidance (CDE, observational notes).

    CDE goes round the table- not asking everyone- on
    what changes they have made since they began the
    course- PT 3- “look at labels, more oats, trying to cut
    down the salt” PT 2-“I’ve learnt a lot, cut down on the
    chocolate, started telling everyone else” (CDE, obser-
    vational notes).

    Group interaction between participants and educators
    Throughout workshops there was a shift between the
    roles of an ‘educator’ (providing health-related informa-
    tion through a didactic approach) or a ‘facilitator’ (encour-
    aging participants to direct sessions in areas they felt were
    relevant and narrating personal experiences). Educators
    were comfortable in an ‘expert-led’ position which allowed
    them to maintain greater control in sessions. This position
    allowed parameters to be set around group discussions i.e.
    ensuring participants discussed the content covered which
    could be personalised:

  • Discussion
  • about tension [stress], thoughts and
    sadness. CDE informing PT 1 to take care of his

    blood pressure- caring daughter approach (CDE,
    observational notes).

    Participants were able to interact with each other at
    ease, once lay educators had set the topic of discussion.
    Small groups formed, primarily by gender, where both
    men and woman felt more comfortable discussing life-
    style behaviours that they felt were gender specific, for
    example weight maintenance. Yet, interactions were di-
    rected towards being more informed so instigating life-
    style changes:

    PTs are very interactive with those who are closest to
    them (PT 13, 7, 6) (PT 8 and 9) and (PT 2 and 3):
    small groups have formed. PT 6,7 very interactive- PT
    5 not present- PT 13 joins this group- females of her
    age- feels she can relate to them better. PT 13 asks
    PT 7 if she would like to go to the gym with her- has
    no one to go with- PT 7 declines- problem with self-
    image- in front of others (CDE, observational notes).

    PT 2 and 3 (both male)- in conversation for a long
    time- conversations lead to questions directed to the
    CDE- all related to the discussion- salt causing high
    BP- giving each other more information (CDE,
    observational notes).

    Supporting self-efficacy
    Discussions with participants were occasions when be-
    havioural change techniques, underpinned by social
    learning theory, were applied. The most common tech-
    nique was encouraging self-efficacy i.e. improving an in-
    dividual’s perception that they can successfully perform
    a behaviour that will have successful outcomes:

    CDE stated that going out, socialising, and going to
    church encourages positive well-being. Participants
    already confident of undertaking tasks that will improve
    their emotional well-being (CDE, observational notes).

    The use of persuasion. Outlining the benefits of
    undertaking certain tasks such as exercise which can
    improve stress management and (CDE) stating to the
    participant more exercise will result in a positive
    outlook; participant nods in agreement (CDE,
    observational notes).

    Appropriate translation
    Workshops delivered in Urdu and Punjabi, either
    through an interpreter or a bi-lingual educator had a
    ‘stop-start’ feature. Workshops with an interpreter often
    involved the educator speaking in English and then the
    interpreter translating information into Punjabi and, at
    times, adding more information than what was actually

    Sidhu et al. BMC Health Services Research (2015) 15:54 Page 8 of 11

    said. The interpreter would often answer patient queries
    directly as a result of previously working on the
    programme. CDEs would struggle to control interactions
    as participants directed their questions to the interpreter
    rather than the CDE. This often resulted in CDEs expli-
    citly asking what was being said in discussions:

    Sorry, so what’s being said? (CDE, observational
    notes).

    The use of interpreters and participants with various
    language requirements created a ‘chain of translation’,
    where the information is first delivered by the educator
    in English, translated into Punjabi by the interpreter
    and then further translated into another community
    language e.g. Bengali, by participants to other members
    of the group, with information being lost along the
    chain:

    PT 5 states she did not understand the translation
    delivered to her by the interpreter- firstly in
    Punjabi, and then does it in Urdu- slightly better.
    PT 5 speaks Bengali- not spoken by the interpreter
    which did make her slightly isolated
    (CDE, observational notes).

    Workshops delivered in a single language tended to
    have less of a ‘stop-start’ feature. This allowed discus-
    sions to develop from activities which led to greater par-
    ticipation from the majority of people in a group.

    Findings: the participant experience
    The promotion and development of chronic disease self-
    management programmes has led to an array of terms
    being used to describe lay people, such as peer mentors,
    peer leaders, peer educators, lay health workers, com-
    munity health workers, community health educators and
    many more. Unsurprisingly, participants were unfamiliar
    with the term ‘Chronic Disease Educator’ or the role:

    The impression I got with him … I was a bit
    apprehensive about him, but when he started talking
    … I think if you need to ask him, he was there to ask
    (CDE-ATT-17, Male, White British, T2D and heart
    conditions).

    Lay educators and participants developed relation-
    ships that were trusting, consisted of rapport and em-
    pathy. In part, the relationships established were,
    paradoxically, given value and meaning through com-
    parison with the relationship participants had with
    their GP. Participants were asked whether lay educa-
    tors recruited from the community influenced the nature
    of the relationship which ensued. Ethnic concordance, for

    some was valued less than other characteristics such as
    being understanding:
    [Interviewer] So, was it of any benefit that [CDE] was

    from a similar background?

    [Respondent] No, whoever’s a good person, like we
    speak to white people, we speak to Black people, so
    what’s wrong if everybody is friendly with each other
    (CDE-ATT-13, Female, Asian Indian, heart
    conditions).

    South Asian respondents, overall, valued lay educators
    from their community because they were able to deliver
    the course in community languages. Instances where
    there were ethnic differences (Indian Sikh participant/
    Pakistani Muslim educator) made little or no difference,
    with the exception of one person who felt a ‘bit more
    comfortable that she [CDE] was Pakistani’ (CDE-ATT-12,
    Female, Asian Pakistani, T2D):

    She was telling everyone in Punjabi, do this, do that,
    she spoke good Punjabi, sometimes she spoke in
    English, everything was fine with her (CDE-ATT-11,
    Female, Asian Indian, T2D and Hypertension).

    For the majority of participants, their relationship with
    lay educators was determined by their prior knowledge
    of self-management. Primarily, there were two types of
    relationships; first, informal and ‘friendly’, and second, a
    didactic teacher-pupil relationship with a clear intention
    of learning:

    He was mostly happy with the fact that on how
    she [CDE] advised on how to lose the weight, how
    to minimise your food [consumption] and stuff
    because he wasn’t very aware of it (CDE-ATT-07,
    Male, Asian Bangladeshi, T2D, via interpreter).

    No, no it didn’t feel like a classroom at all, no, it was
    just like you were going in to have a talk with a normal
    friend in a friendly atmosphere (CDE-ATT-03, Female,
    White British, T2D).

    Members from various ethnic groups described experi-
    encing different types of relationships. White British and
    Black/Black Caribbean interviewees described the rela-
    tionship as informal, based on personal conversations,
    friendliness, and listening. In contrast, South Asian in-
    terviewees described a formal relationship based on
    learning and developing skills that would potentially im-
    prove the management of their conditions. South Asian
    participants appeared content with a ‘teacher-pupil’ rela-
    tionship acknowledging that the lay educator was better
    informed and should lead workshops.

    Sidhu et al. BMC Health Services Research (2015) 15:54 Page 9 of 11

    Peer-to-peer exchanges were limited to sharing per-
    sonal narratives, discussing past experiences of living
    with and managing conditions, and relieving emotional
    distress. Participants listened with scepticism to the narra-
    tives of other group members. For some, self-management
    of chronic diseases, particularly diabetes, was interpreted
    as a personalised experience, for example, participants liv-
    ing with diabetes spoke of dealing with hypoglycaemic
    episodes:

    if you ask another person with diabetes, he will tell
    you his experience, you could ask a hundred people, if
    you talk to a hundred people they all give you their
    advice, of their experience, but sometimes it doesn’t
    work with you, you know (CDE-ATT-15, Male, Asian
    Indian, T2D).

    Because we’re all individuals, what suits me, they
    could not copy me because it may not suit them
    (CDE-ATT-04, Female, Black Caribbean, T2D).

    The whole condition was brought out in the group
    because people were at different stages with their
    diabetes and on different medication and they were
    experiencing different things because a lot of them, or
    some of them, had different health issues, medical
    issues, as well as their diabetes (CDE-ATT-10, Female,
    Black Carribbean, T2D).

    Notably, when participants shared a personal narrative
    there was a lack of facilitation from lay educators. None
    of the lay educators had the experience of living with
    chronic diseases. Greater facilitation by concentrating on
    positive experiences e.g. appropriately dealing with
    hypoglycaemic events, rather than negative experiences
    could potentially result in greater peer-to-peer learning.

    Discussion
    Design
    The group-based format of the programme allowed partici-
    pants to share personal experiences of living with chronic
    diseases but were unstructured and without a specific goal
    in mind. In comparison, Greenhalgh et al. [23] ‘sharing stor-
    ies’ intervention had a clear focus on a topic of discussion
    (medication), participants sharing problems (specific issues
    with taking a combination of drugs), identification of com-
    mon problem (group members not taking medication), and
    an outcome (telling GPs about non-concordance and GP
    informing participants how to deal with side effects from
    drugs). The group-based approach lacked an exchange of
    skills and/or learning from each other’s experiences.
    Analysis of participant accounts has shown that people

    from certain ethnic communities have different learning
    requirements and skills they wish to develop. A review

    by White et al. [24] investigating the effectiveness of in-
    terventions to promote healthy eating in people from
    minority-ethnic groups found behavioural modification
    was more effective in European origin (White) groups
    compared to minority-ethnic groups. Interventions ac-
    commodating South Asian groups should concentrate on
    addressing cultural barriers to effective self-management,
    specifically addressing commitment to religious beliefs,
    linguistic differences between patients and health workers,
    and low literacy levels [8].

    Implementation
    Understanding the role of lay educators was important
    for participants, as it influenced the type of role they
    adopted within workshops and their interpretation of
    the CDE programme. The relationship between partici-
    pants and CDEs was contextualised and understood in
    relation to perceptions towards the quality of care they
    expected to receive from health professionals. As a re-
    sult, the relationship was performing a core aspect of
    their perceived ‘doctor-patient’ relationship; an on-going
    personalised therapeutic relationship based on listening
    and allowing the patient to have a greater say in their
    treatment [25]. Lay educators (and organisations deliver-
    ing CDSMPs) need to demonstrate how this programme
    fits within wider health services. Lay educators may
    benefit from formally being introduced in a team model
    with health professionals (GPs, practice nurses); with lay
    people, from the local community, playing a valuable
    role by providing contextual information about a pa-
    tient’s attitudes, behaviour, and environment [26].

    Delivery
    The training needs of lay people delivering group-based
    health education to minority-ethnic disadvantaged popu-
    lations need to be examined. There were a number of
    areas where training could be provided: how to commu-
    nicate with health professionals, facilitating discussions
    with adult learners, and how to work with interpreters.
    In contrast to findings presented by Brown et al. [17],
    lay educators did not express any need to develop their
    knowledge on healthy living or chronic diseases as they
    were comfortable dealing with health beliefs held by
    members from various ethnic communities. Hipwell
    et al. [27] noted the need for cultural competence train-
    ing i.e. enhancing tutor confidence when dealing with
    multi-ethnic groups. Through observation of the CDE
    programme it was clear lay people delivering self-
    management interventions need to be adequately
    trained (or undertake further training) in techniques
    which encourage a person to change their behaviour.
    The techniques that need to be developed are:

    1) recognising which behaviours to change,

    Sidhu et al. BMC Health Services Research (2015) 15:54 Page 10 of 11

    2) making explicit the health benefits of making
    changes,

    3) setting realistic targets (use of SMART goals or
    action planning),

    4) reviewing targets, and
    5) informing individuals how to deal with potential

    setbacks.

    The definition and application of these techniques
    have been explained in Improving Health: Changing Be-
    haviour, NHS Health Trainer Handbook [28]. Recruiting
    lay educators from the community benefited members
    from the South Asian population most compared to other
    ethnic groups. South Asian participants who attended the
    CDE programme benefited from improved communica-
    tion while Black Caribbean and White participants bene-
    fited from establishing close understanding relationships.
    Ethnic concordance is thought to reduce the potential
    for power disparities between patient and health care
    provider, consequently patients becoming more in-
    volved in the decision making process. Yet, in this
    programme ethnic concordance had little or no differ-
    ence with regard to participant involvement, particu-
    larly with South Asian participants.

    Strengths and limitations
    Strengths of our study are the use of mixed methods,
    the application of research instruments that were the-
    matically designed with reference to self-management
    literature and data were collected from a diverse sample
    of different ethnic and religious groups, male and female
    and living with a range of chronic diseases. Participants
    with language requirements were included within the
    sample (Punjabi, Bengali and Urdu speakers). There
    were a number of limitations. Participants, in their major-
    ity, came from courses delivered by three lay educators.
    For some interviewees there was also a considerable
    amount of time between completing the course and
    conducting the interview which inevitably affected
    what participants could remember about attending the
    programme.

    Conclusion
    Understanding the role of educators delivering self-
    management interventions within the UK is under-
    developed, particularly with minority-ethnic populations.
    Analysis of our findings show greater considerations need
    to be made in relation to designing content, methods of
    implementation, and on-going training for lay educators
    when facilitating behavioural change. Lay educators re-
    cruited from the community bring a number of skills,
    particularly knowledge of health beliefs and practices,
    yet, for participants attending self-management inter-
    ventions, skills such as empathy, understanding, and

    providing health information bypassed issues of ethnic
    concordance.

    Additional files

    Additional file 1: Research Instrument for Chronic Disease Educator
    Semi-Structured interviews.

    Additional file 2: Research Instrument for Chronic Disease Educator
    programme: Participant interviews.

    Additional file 3: Research instrument for observation.

    Additional file 4: Themes and supporting quotes.

  • Competing interests
  • The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

  • Authors’ contributions
  • MS collected data, conducted analysis and co-wrote this paper. NG and KJ
    contributed to the interpretation of analysis and co-wrote this paper. PG and
    TM reviewed the final draft of this paper. All authors read and approved the
    final manuscript.

  • Acknowledgements
  • This work was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
    through the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and
    Care for Birmingham and Black Country (CLAHRC-BBC) programme. Primary
    Care Clinical Sciences is a member of the NIHR National School of Primary
    Care Research. The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily
    those of the NIHR, the Department of Health, NHS Partner Trusts, University
    of Birmingham or the CLAHRC-BBC Theme 6 Steering Group. KJ and TM are
    part-funded by the NIHR CLARHC-WM.

  • Author details
  • 1Primary Care Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston,
    Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. 2Health Services Management Centre, School of
    Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
    3Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of
    Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.

    Received: 8 October 2014 Accepted: 19 January 2015

  • References
  • 1. Kurian AK, Cardarelli KM. Racial and ethnic differences in cardiovascular

    disease risk factors: a systematic review. Ethn Dis. 2007;17(1):143–52.
    2. Bazargan M, Johnson KH, Stein JA. Emergency department utilization

    among Hispanic and African American underserved patients with type 2
    diabetes. Ethn Dis. 2003;13:369–75.

    3. Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, Brown BW, Bandura A, Ritter P. Evidence
    suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve
    health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Med Care.
    1999;37:5–14.

    4. Von Korff M, Gruman J, Schaefer J. Collaborative management of chronic
    illness. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:1097–192.

    5. Kennedy AP, Reeves D, Bower PJ, Lee V, Middleton E, Richardson E, et al.
    The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a national lay-led self care
    support programme for patients with long term conditions: a pragmatic
    randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61:254–61.

    6. Clark T, Sleath B, Rubin RH. Influence of ethnicity and language
    concordance on physician–patient agreement about recommended
    changes in patient health behavior. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;53:87–93.

    7. Resnicow K, Baranowski T, Ahluwalia JS. Cultural sensitivity in public health:
    defined and demystified. Ethn Dis. 1999;9:10–21.

    8. Zeh P, Sandhu H, Cannaby AM, Sturt J. Cultural barriers impeding ethnic
    minority groups from accessing effective diabetes care services: a
    Systematic review of observation studies. Divers Equality Health Care.
    2014;11:9–33.

    9. Greenhalgh T, Collard A, Campbell-Richards D, Vijayaraghavan S, Malik F,
    Morris J, et al. Storylines of self-management: narratives of people with

    http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/supplementary/s12913-015-0712-8-s1

    http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/supplementary/s12913-015-0712-8-s2

    http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/supplementary/s12913-015-0712-8-s3

    http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/supplementary/s12913-015-0712-8-s4

    Sidhu et al. BMC Health Services Research (2015) 15:54 Page 11 of 11

    diabetes from a multiethnic inner city population. J Health Serv Res Policy.
    2011;16(1):37–43.

    10. Davidson EM, Liu JJ, Bhopal R, White M, Johnson MRD, Netto G, et al.
    Behavior change interventions to improve the health of racial and ethnic
    minority populations: a tool kit of adaptation approaches. Milbank Q.
    2013;91(4):811–51.

    11. Kreuter MW, Wray RJ. Tailored and targeted health communication:
    strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am J Health Behav.
    2003;27:S227–32.

    12. Lloyd CE, Sturt J, Johnson M, Mughal S, Collins GS, Barnett AH. (Anthony H.)
    Development of alternative methods of data collection in South Asians with
    Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2008;25(4):455–62.

    13. Abraham C, Michie S. A taxonomy of behaviour change techniques used in
    interventions. Health Psychol. 2008;27(3):379–87.

    14. Lorig KR, Holman HR. Self-management education: history, definition,
    outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003;26(1):1–7.

    15. Bandura A. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1977.
    16. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage

    Publications; 1994.
    17. Brown C, Hennings J, Caress AL, Partridge MR. Lay educators in asthma

    self-management: reflections on their training and experiences. Patient Educ
    Couns. 2007;68:131–8.

    18. Tozer R, Aubery L, Gill P, Jones C. Patel Mahendra Zaidi Q. Atkin K
    Developing cultural competence across communities: a coronary heart
    disease training programme for health advocates and trainers Divers Health
    Care. 2010;7:177–88.

    19. Gold RL. Roles in sociological field observations. Social Forces, University of
    North Carolina Press. 1958;36(3):217–23.

    20. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications;
    1985.

    21. Boyatzis R. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and
    Code Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.

    22. Charmaz K. The grounded theory method: an explication and interpretation.
    In: Emerson RM, editor. Contemporary Field Research: A Collection of
    Readings. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press; 1983. p. 109–26.

    23. Greenhalgh T, Collard A, Begum N. Sharing stories: complex intervention for
    diabetes education in minority-ethnic groups who do not speak English.
    BMJ. 2005;330:628.

    24. White M, Carlin L, Rankin J, Adamson A. Effectiveness of Interventions to
    Promote Healthy Eating in People from Minority-ethnic Groups: A Review.
    London: Health Education Authority; 1998.

    25. Guthrie B, Wyke S. Personal continuity and access in UK general practice: a
    qualitative study of general practitioners’ and patients’ perceptions of when
    and how they matter. BMC Fam Pract. 2006;7:11.

    26. Martinez J, Ro M, Villa NW. Transforming the delivery of care in the
    post-health reform era: what role will community health workers play? Am J
    Public Health. 2011;101(12):e1–5.

    27. Hipwell A, Turner A, Barlow J. ‘We’re not fully aware of their cultural needs’:
    tutors’ experiences of delivering the Expert Patients Programme to South
    Asian attendees. Diversity in Health and Social Care. 2008;5(4):281–90.

    28. Department of Health. Improving Health: Changing Behaviour, NHS Health
    Trainer Handbook. London: Department of Health, Stationary Office; 2007.

    Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central
    and take full advantage of:

    • Convenient online submission

    • Thorough peer review

    • No space constraints or color figure charges

    • Immediate publication on acceptance

    • Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar

    • Research which is freely available for redistribution

    Submit your manuscript at
    www.biomedcentral.com/submit

      Abstract

      Background

      Methods

      Results

      Conclusions

      Background

      Methods

      Study design

      Setting

      Intervention

      Fidelity of the intervention

      Recruiting lay people from the community

      Sample

      Data collection

      Data analysis

      Consent and ethical issues

      Results

      Findings: Lay educators

      Cultural receptivity

      Working with and without interpreters

      Findings: observations for fidelity

      Use of appropriate cultural adaptations

      Setting goals and reviewing progress against targets

      Group interaction between participants and educators

      Supporting self-efficacy

      Appropriate translation

      Findings: the participant experience

      Discussion

      Design

      Implementation

      Delivery

      Strengths and limitations

      Conclusion

      Additional files

      Competing interests

      Authors’ contributions

      Acknowledgements

      Author details

      References

    IHP 670 Module Seven Program Critique Guidelines and Rubric

    Overview

    You will complete five program cri�que assignments in the course to support your work as you prepare for your final project. These assignments ask that you cri�que a program described

    within an iden�fied ar�cle located in the module’s resources. These ar�cles were chosen because they relate to the module’s topics and demonstrate some common problems that programs

    encounter. In each assignment, you will have the opportunity to cri�que certain program components, such as resources, ac�vi�es, outcome measures, use of feedback loops, assump�ons,

    and external barriers. Once planners have iden�fied the details for each of the program components, they must step back and assess how those components can best operate within the

    program’s environment. That involves considering concepts such as cultural competency, systems thinking, ethical prac�ce, and others. You will focus on these different concepts, in turn,

    through the program cri�ques. As you develop your program cri�que skills, you will be asked to iden�fy areas that could be or need to be improved and offer recommenda�ons.

    In this assignment, you will cri�que a health or healthcare program using the program cri�que reading in the Resources sec�on of this module. The reading portrays example program

    decision-making relevant to module content. The selected program cri�que reading is the required reading for this assignment. For this assignment, you will iden�fy the ac�vi�es used to

    achieve cultural competence. Then, you will explain whether the given program sa�sfies the four key ethical principles. Finally, you will describe addi�onal ac�vi�es that would help ensure

    the program has met the principles of social jus�ce.

    This assignment will help you analyze how your program is expected to address cultural competence and sa�sfy key ethical and social jus�ce principles. It will also ask you to consider the

    importance of health literacy when interac�ng with targeted popula�ons. You will use findings from this assignment to improve your strategy to address cultural competence in your

    program.

    Prompt

    Write a program cri�que that examines a health or healthcare program designed to improve self-management for individuals living with chronic disease. As you develop your cri�que, assess

    the program’s design to achieve cultural competence. Determine if each of the four key ethical principles were sa�sfied and if the principles of social jus�ce were considered.

    Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

    1. Social Jus�ce Principles: Determine whether the program considered principles of social jus�ce, providing examples to support your claims. Consider the following ques�ons to guide

    your response:

    Which principles of social jus�ce were met and which weren’t? Jus�fy your ra�onale.

    What ac�vi�es would you add to improve this aspect of the program?

    2. Key Ethical Principles: Explain whether the program sa�sfied the four key ethical principles required of program designs, providing examples to support your claims. Consider the

    following ques�ons to guide your response:

    Why is designing and evalua�ng a program in an ethical manner important?

    

    2/18/25, 1:52 PM Assignment Information

    https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/le/content/1803305/viewContent/38362620/View 1/3

    https://app.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=9568&url=https%3A%2F%2Flearn.snhu.edu%2Fcontent%2Fenforced%2F1803305-IHP-670-10224.202517-1%2FModule%2520Seven%2520Program%2520Critique%2520Guidelines%2520and%2520Rubric.html&lang=en_us&readid=d2l_read_element_1

    What improvements would you suggest for this program to ensure it adheres to ethical principles?

    3. Cultural Competence: Determine whether the program adequately addressed cultural competence, explaining your ra�onale. Consider the following ques�ons to guide your response:

    What addi�onal ac�vi�es would you suggest to address cultural competence in the given program?

    Do you believe the program’s cultural competence ac�vi�es impacted the outcomes? Why or why not?

    4. Summary and Recommenda�ons: Summarize your findings from the program analysis and share your recommenda�ons to improve the considera�on of

    cultural competence, social

    jus�ce, and ethical principles. Consider the following ques�on to guide your response:

    What would you do differently to ensure the given program sa�sfies key ethical and social jus�ce principles and addresses cultural competency?

    Note that all the claims in your deliverable should be evidence based. Your cita�ons should be from your independent search for evidence (not from the scenario, textbook, or module

    resources) of credible sources and be current within the last five years. You are required to cite a minimum of two sources overall. Refer to the Shapiro Library Guide: Nursing—Graduate

    located in the Start Here sec�on of the course for addi�onal support. If you need wri�ng support, access the Online Wri�ng Center through the Academic Support module of your course

    What to Submit

    Your submission should be a 2- to 3-page Word document. Also include a �tle page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. You should include a

    minimum of two sources. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

    Module Seven Program Critique Rubric

    Criteria Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value

    Social Jus�ce Principles

    Exceeds proficiency in an

    excep�onally clear and

    insigh�ul manner, using

    industry-specific language

    Determines whether the

    program considered principles

    of social jus�ce, providing

    examples to

    support

    claims

    Shows progress toward

    proficiency, but with errors or

    omissions

    Does not a�empt criterion 20

    Key Ethical Principles Exceeds proficiency in an

    excep�onally clear and

    insigh�ul manner, using

    industry-specific language

    Explains whether the program

    sa�sfied the four key ethical

    principles required of program

    designs, providing examples to

    support claims

    Shows progress toward

    proficiency, but with errors or

    omissions

    Does not a�empt criterion 20

    Cultural Competence Exceeds proficiency in an

    excep�onally clear and

    insigh�ul manner, using

    industry-specific language

    Determines whether the

    program adequately addressed

    cultural competence,

    explaining the ra�onale

    Shows progress toward

    proficiency, but with errors or

    omissions

    Does not a�empt criterion 20

    2/18/25, 1:52 PM Assignment Information

    https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/le/content/1803305/viewContent/38362620/View 2/3

    Criteria Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value

    Summary and

    Recommenda�ons

    Exceeds proficiency in an

    excep�onally clear and

    insigh�ul manner, using

    industry-specific language

    Summarizes the findings from

    the program analysis and

    shares recommenda�ons to

    improve the considera�on of

    cultural competence, social

    jus�ce, and ethical principles

    Shows progress toward

    proficiency, but with errors or

    omissions

    Does not a�empt criterion 1

    5

    Ar�cula�on of Response Exceeds proficiency in an

    excep�onally clear and

    insigh�ul manner

    Clearly conveys meaning with

    correct grammar, sentence

    structure, and spelling,

    demonstra�ng an

    understanding of audience and

    purpose

    Shows progress toward

    proficiency, but with errors in

    grammar, sentence structure,

    and spelling, nega�vely

    impac�ng readability

    Submission has cri�cal errors in

    grammar, sentence structure,

    and spelling, preven�ng

    understanding of ideas

    10

    Professional Sources Incorporates more than two

    professional, current (within

    the last five years) sources, or

    use of sources is excep�onally

    insigh�ul

    Incorporates two professional,

    current (within the last five

    years) sources that support

    claims

    Incorporates fewer than two

    professional, current (within

    the last five years) sources, or

    not all sources support claims

    Does not incorporate sources 10

    APA Style

    Formats in-text cita�ons and

    reference list according to APA

    style with no

    errors

    Formats in-text cita�ons and

    reference list according to APA

    style with fewer than five

    errors

    Formats in-text cita�ons and

    reference list according to APA

    style with five or more errors

    Does not format in-text

    cita�ons and reference list

    according to APA style

    5

    Total: 100%

    2/18/25, 1:52 PM Assignment Information

    https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/le/content/1803305/viewContent/38362620/View 3/3

    Still stressed from student homework?
    Get quality assistance from academic writers!

    Order your essay today and save 25% with the discount code LAVENDER