7-2 Presentation: Rule 26 and Evidence

ACC 692 Module Seven Presentation Guidelines and Rubric

Scenario

Since you are an experienced fraud investigator, your supervisor has asked you to lead a training session for newly hired investigators at your firm. This training session should focus on the intricacies of Rule 26 and other legal compliance measures regarding the collection and sharing of evidence in fraud investigations, including the role of the expert witness. The presentation should equip the investigators with the knowledge and skills necessary to ensure that evidence collection and other parts of their investigations are conducted with integrity and follow legal guidelines that result in successful prosecution of fraud cases.

Directions

Using the provided PowerPoint presentation template, apply Rule 26 and other legal requirements to the role of the fraud investigator. Be sure to include speaker notes for each slide to clearly articulate the information that should be presented. Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

1. Describe the framework for collecting and handling evidence as prescribed by Rule 26.
2. Discuss the importance of following Rule 26 and other legal guidelines for the discovery and handling of evidence in a fraud investigation.
3. Explain how Rule 26 can help a fraud investigator anticipate legal challenges regarding evidence collection.
4. Describe how legal requirements might differ between collecting evidence and sharing evidence in a fraud investigation.

What to Submit

Submit your 6-slide Microsoft PowerPoint presentation with speaker notes by completing the

Module Seven Presentation Template

. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

Module Seven Presentation Rubric

0%)

Framework

Rule 26Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, or sophisticated manner

Does not attempt criterion20

Legal ChallengesExceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, or sophisticated manner

Does not attempt criterion20

Legal RequirementsExceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, or sophisticated manner

Does not attempt criterion20

Clear Communication

10

Citations and Attributions

10

Criteria	Exemplary (		10	Proficient (90%)	Needs Improvement (70%)	Not Evident (0%)	Value
			Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, or sophisticated manner	Describes the framework for collecting and handling evidence as prescribed by Rule 26	Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include adding details related to describing the framework for collecting and handling evidence as prescribed by Rule 26				Does not attempt criterion				20
Discusses the importance of following Rule 26 and other legal guidelines for the discovery and handling of evidence in a fraud investigation	Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include adding details related to discussing the importance of following Rule 26 and other legal guidelines for the discovery and handling of evidence in a fraud investigation
Explains how Rule 26 can help a fraud investigator anticipate legal challenges regarding evidence collection	Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include adding details related to explaining how Rule 26 can help a fraud investigator anticipate legal challenges regarding evidence collection
Describes how legal requirements might differ between collecting evidence and sharing evidence in a fraud investigation	Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include adding details related to describing how legal requirements might differ between collecting evidence and sharing evidence in a fraud investigation
Exceeds proficiency with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understanding	Consistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audience	Shows progress towards proficiency, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understanding	Shows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication
Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with few or no minor errors	Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with consistent minor errors	Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with major errors	Does not use citations for ideas requiring attribution
Total:	100%

ACC 692 MODULE SEVEN PRESENTATION TEMPLATE
[Complete this template by replacing the bracketed text with the relevant information. Remove this instruction
before submitting.]
[Insert student name.]
FRAMEWORK
 [Insert text.]
RULE 26
 [Insert text.]
LEGAL CHALLENGES
 [Insert text.]
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
 [Insert text.]
REFERENCES
 [Insert text.]