USA: +1(669)289-8683 
Sign in
Resource: Magnolia Therapeutic Solutions Case
Read the Magnolia Therapeutic Solutions Case located on the student website.
Write a 700- to 1,000-word paper responding to the following questions:
·
How did your decision compare to the board’s decision? Why did you make the decision you did? What effect did organizational infrastructure and culture have on your decision?
· What do you think were the main causes behind the problems that Magnolia ultimately suffered? What would you have done differently to avoid those problems?
· What differences in acquiring revenue, accruing expenses, and training key personnel are there between a nonprofit organization’s inability to thrive and a for-profit organization’s inability to thrive? Cite at least three differences.
· What is Magnolia’s deficit in terms of risk management?
Format the paper consistent with APA guidelines.
University of Phoenix
Colleges of Arts and Sciences
BSHS/373 – Financial Management in Human Services
Week One
Magnolia Therapeutic Solutions Case Study GRADING RUBRIC
|
Content |
Points Available 8 |
Points Earned X/8 |
Additional Comments: |
||
|
All key questions are answered in a substantive way and are supported by specific details, examples, or analysis: · Comparison of the board’s decision with the student’s decision · Main causes of Magnolia’s problems and discussion of what might have been done differently · Differences acquiring revenue, accruing expenses, and training of key personnel are there in a nonprofit organization’s inability to thrive and a for-profit organization’s inability to thrive. · Magnolia’s deficit in terms of risk management |
|
||||
|
Organization / Development |
Points Available 3 |
Points Earned
X/3 |
|||
|
· The paper is 700- to 1,000-words in length. · The introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points. · Paragraph transitions are present and logical and maintain the flow throughout the paper. · The tone is appropriate to the content and assignment. · Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. · Sentences are well-constructed with consistently strong, varied sentences. · Sentence transitions are present and maintain the flow of thought. · The conclusion is logical, flows, and reviews the major points. |
|||||
|
Mechanics |
|||||
|
· The paper, including the title page, reference page, tables, and appendices, follow APA guidelines for format. · Citations of original works within the body of the paper follow APA guidelines. · The paper is laid out with effective use of headings, font styles, and white space. · Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed. · Spelling is correct |
|||||
|
Total Available |
Total Earned |
||||
|
14 |
