3.2 Case Study: Murdaugh Case Study 3 and 4.2 Case Study: Murdaugh Case Study 4

This case study assignment is designed to have you apply the main topics from the readings and presentations assigned this week. Each week you will review the case and answer the questions posed based on each week’s content.

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

Please review the case studies and answer all the questions. Each case study response must be at least one double-spaced page, APA format.

Based on this business structure, what liability does the firm have related to Murdaugh’s mishandling of client accounts?

As a partner of the firm, what will Murdaugh’s personal liability be, if any, based on the business structure?

  • What business structure, if any, might have offered PMPED great protection from liability?
  • Name your file to include your last name and the file name. Example: Wk3_CaseStudy_Smith.
  • This case study assignment is designed to have you apply the main topics from the readings and presentations assigned this week. Each week you will review the case and answer the questions posed based on the week’s content.
  • Please review the case studies and answer all the questions. Each case study response must be at least one double-spaced page, APA format.

    Save Time On Research and Writing
    Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
    Get My Paper

    Based on your understanding of these white-collar crimes, explain how PMPED could possibly escape being charged with similar charges.

    How do you think PMPED could have possibly missed so many cases of fraud impacting clients?

    What level of accountability do you think they have to clients of the firm represented by Murdaugh that were victims of the crimes in which he is charged?

  • Name your file to include your last name and the file name. Example: Wk4_CaseStudy_Smith.
  • Page 1
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-1
    Page 2
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-2
    The Legal & Regulatory
    Environment of Business 19e
    Chapter 14
    Business Organizations
    Pagnattaro Cahoy Magid Shedd
    14-2
    Page 3
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-3
    Learning Objectives
    • To describe the factors to consider when
    deciding on the form of organization
    • To contrast the basic organizational forms that
    businesses select to conduct business
    • To compare the hybrid organizational forms
    businesses may utilize to take advantage of
    attributes of various basic structures
    Page 4
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-4
    Learning Objectives, II
    • To describe the authority of agents to act on
    behalf of a principal in contracts and beyond.
    • To recognize trends in managing
    organizations.
    Page 5
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-5
    Forms of Business Organizations
    • Basic
    – Sole proprietorships
    – Partnerships
    – Corporations
    • Hybrid
    – Limited partnerships
    – S corporations
    – Limited liability companies
    – Limited liability partnerships
    Page 6
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-6
    Number of Owners
    • Closely held: Organizations owned by only a
    few persons
    – Family-owned and family-operated businesses
    • Publicly held: Businesses owned by hundreds
    or thousands of persons
    – Business stock is traded on a public exchange
    Page 7
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-7
    pop
    QUIZ
    pop
    QUIZ
    pop
    QUIZ
    Pop Quiz
    Which is not a basic form of business
    organization?
    a. Corporation
    b. Partnership
    c. Union
    d. Sole proprietorship
    Page 8
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-8
    Factors to Consider When Selecting
    a Business’s Organizational Form
    • Cost of creation
    • Continuity of the organization
    • Managerial control of decision
    • Owner liability
    • Taxation
    Page 9
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-9
    Figure 14.1 – Corporate Form Selection
    Factors
    Source: Delaware Division of Corporations, Legal Business Structure Table,
    https://revenuefiles.delaware.gov/docs/business_structures_table.pdf
    Page 10
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-10
    Figure 14.1 – Corporate Form Selection
    Factors, II
    Source: Delaware Division of Corporations, Legal Business Structure Table,
    https://revenuefiles.delaware.gov/docs/business_structures_table.pdf
    Page 11
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-11
    Sole Proprietorships
    • Least expensive business organization to
    create
    • Proprietorship’s continuity is tied directly to
    the will of the owner
    • Sole proprietor is in total control of the
    business’s goals and operations
    • Owner has unlimited liability for the
    obligations of the business organization
    • Not taxed as an organization
    Page 12
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-12
    Partnerships
    • Agreement between two or more persons to
    share a common interest in a commercial
    endeavour
    • Factors while considering the appropriateness
    – Creation
    – Continuity
    – Managerial control
    – Liability
    – Taxation
    Page 13
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-13
    think
    TANK
    think
    TANK
    think
    TANK
    Think Tank
    Each partner in a partnership is jointly
    and severally liable for claims
    against the partnership
    a. True
    b. False
    Page 14
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-14
    Corporations
    • Artificial and intangible entity created under
    the authority of a state’s law
    • Types
    – Domestic
    – Foreign
    – Alien
    Page 15
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-15
    Corporations, II
    • Creation
    – Created by a state issuing a charter upon the
    application of incorporators
    – Corporation must be licensed to be able to
    conduct business in foreign states
    • Continuity
    – Corporation has perpetual existence
    – Shareholder’s death or sale of stock does not
    affect the organizational structure
    Page 16
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-16
    Corporate Managerial Control
    Shareholders
    Board Of
    Directors
    Officers
    Employees
    Elected
    Hired
    Page 17
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-17
    Corporation: Liability
    • Limited personal liability: Owners are liable
    for debts only to the extent of shareholders’
    investment in the cost of stocks
    • Piercing the corporate veil: Marginalization of
    the corporate entity by courts when finding
    out that the corporation is being misused
    • Alter-ego theory: Used to impose personal
    liability upon corporate officers, directors, and
    stockholders
    Page 18
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-18
    Case 14.1 – Corporations Liability
    • Case
    – Alli V. U.S.
    – 83 Fed. Cl. 250 (2008)
    – Federal Claims Court
    • Issue
    – Dr. Alli and his spouse, property owners, sued the U.S.
    Department of Housing and Urban Development
    (HUD) for failure to pay housing assistance. These
    owners held apartment complexes through BSA
    Corporation. Should the court strip away the liability
    protection of the Allis’ corporation and pierce the
    corporate veil?
    Page 19
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-19
    Corporations: Taxation
    • Corporations must pay income taxes on their
    earnings
    • Double tax: Profits taxed at corporate level and
    then dividends taxed at individual level
    • Methods to avoid double taxation
    – Reasonable salaries
    – Reasonable expense accounts
    – Reasonable loans from shareholders
    – Reasonable accumulation of earnings
    – Subchapter S election
    Page 20
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-20
    Limited Partnerships
    • Includes all the attributes of a partnership
    • Limited partners: Not responsible for the
    debts of the business organization
    • General partners: Personally liable for the
    organization’s debts
    Page 21
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-21
    S Corporations
    • Shareholders of certain corporations elect
    unanimously so that the organization is
    treated like a partnership
    • Include all legal features of a corporation
    • Shareholders have to account individual
    income tax returns for shares of profits or
    losses
    Page 22
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-22
    S Corporations, II
    • Shareholders avoid having a tax assessed on
    the corporate income
    • Cannot have more than 100 shareholders
    • Individuals are eligible to elect under
    subchapter S
    Page 23
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-23
    Limited Liability Organizations
    • Limited liability company (LLC)
    – Treated as nontaxable entities
    – Owners have more flexibility compared with S
    corporation
    • Limited liability partnership (LLP)
    – Variation of the LLC
    – Have characteristics of both a partnership and a
    corporation
    Page 24
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-24
    Non-Profits
    • Must be approved by the IRS
    • Created for a specific reason allowed by law
    • Must be created for a public purpose and not
    to personally benefit owners or members
    • Must return any profits made to the
    organization to be used for future operations
    Page 25
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-25
    Operating the Organization through
    Agents
    • Roles of a principal, agent, third-party, and
    independent contractor
    • Contractual liability from an agent’s acts
    – The different types of authority: actual, implied
    and apparent
    – The concept of ratification
    • Tort liability from an agent’s acts
    – Respondeat superior
    • Criminal liability from an agent’s acts
    Page 26
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-26
    Case 14.2 – Fiduciary Duties of
    Corporate Executives
    • Case
    – Marchand v. Barnhill
    – 212 A.3d 805 (Del. 2019)
    – Delaware Supreme Court
    • Issue
    – When Blue Bell Creameries had a listeria
    outbreak, forcing it to recall its product, shut
    down production, and lay off employees, did key
    executives breach fiduciary duties to
    shareholders?
    Page 27
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-27
    Deciding on Organizational Form
    • Review should be performed in consultation
    with advisers
    • Factors and costs involved should be
    appropriately weighed
    • Most suitable form should be selected
    Page 28
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-28
    Trends in Management
    • Benefit corporation: Combines aspects of
    non-profit and profit organizations
    – Pursues explicit socially oriented goals
    • Continued definition of the nature of
    corporate personhood
    – Corporations are considered as legal persons
    – Corporations and individuals have equal claim to
    rights and protections under the law
    Page 29
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 14-29
    Trends in Management, II
    • Increased decline in criminal prosecutions for
    corporate wrongdoing under deferred
    prosecution agreements (DPA)
    – Encourages self-reporting and remediation of
    illegal acts before a criminal case is commenced
    – Could lead to an overly lenient environment for
    addressing corporate malfeasance
    Page 1
    Alex Murdaugh was the benefactor of being born into a South Carolina legal dynasty. For many years, he
    rose to local notoriety due to his family’s legacy and his own legal conquests. In fact, Murdaugh was a
    partner at the law firm on which his great grandfather founded practicing alongside his father and
    brother. From the outside, he had a picture-perfect life – a wife, two sons, a successful career, multiple
    homes, wealthy lifestyle, etc.
    While there had been many questionable events over the years, the Murdaugh family had remained
    unscathed. However, a crack to the foundation of the Murdaugh’s occurred in 2019 which put his family
    in the local spotlight, and they faced scrutiny like never before. Murdaugh underage son, Paul, had a
    deadly boating crash that occurred while he was heavily intoxicated. Paul was charged criminally, and
    the family faced a civil suit for the accident. As a result, the community began to report prior
    questionable acts of the family which included an accident that resulted in the death of their maid,
    unpaid client settlements of clients, and embezzlement of funds from his law firm.
    As the scrutiny heightened and legal proceedings were eminent, Murdaugh’s wife, Maggie, and his son,
    Paul, were brutally murdered on the family’s hunting property. As the investigation into the deaths was
    initiated, the actions of Murdaugh hit a bizarre level. He plotted his own murder in order to allow his
    surviving son, Buster, to collect on a life insurance policy. However, the plot failed miserably, raising
    more questions. Murdaugh immediately checked into a rehabilitation facility and admitted to a severe
    addiction to opioids. The wheels of justice were in motion for Murdaugh at this point and there was no
    stopping the momentum.
    Murdaugh was charged, tried and found guilty of the murders of his wife and son. While likely one of
    the more publicized cases, this is just one of many legal cases against Murdaugh. In the next five weeks,
    we are going to review some of the other cases that are still looming for Murdaugh related to business
    law.
    Ethics and the law can be intertwined at a minimum standard. Many times, ethics are considered a
    higher standard of operating than the law requires. It is a requirement that an organization abide by the
    laws, but it is a duty to establish ethical standards in which they, as an entity and their employees, are
    held accountable.
    During this review of the Alex Murdaugh legal saga, we will look at not only the legal quandary that he
    currently faces but also the ethical failures that occurred over time that was not questioned until these
    legal woes became too big to turn a blind eye any longer.
    When an attorney is sworn into the South Carolina Bar, they take an oath of their responsibilities. Two of
    the excerpts of their ethical standards and duties is noted below:
    “To my clients, I pledge faithfulness, competence, diligence, good judgment and prompt communication;
    and
    I will respect and preserve inviolate the confidences of my client, and will accept no compensation in
    connection with a client’s business except from the client or with the client’s knowledge and approval;”
    Based on this oath, Murdaugh owed a legal and ethical duty to his client. The law firm in which
    Murdaugh was associated also had a legal and ethical duty to provide oversight of his actions as he was
    an acting fiduciary of the firm. However, both Murdaugh and his law firm failed his clients to ensure
    Page 2
    they were represented in an ethical manner. As a result of his ethical violations, Murdaugh has been
    disbarred from the South Carolina bar. To mitigate their damages, the law firm in which Murdaugh
    worked has sued him for his unethical practices also. Below is a summary of the cases pending against
    him.
    Alex Murdaugh, the disbarred South Carolina lawyer convicted of murdering his wife and son,
    was indicted Wednesday on more than 20 counts of orchestrating financial schemes that
    allegedly stole millions of dollars from his clients over 16 years.
    Among the charges is that Murdaugh defrauded the estate of Gloria Satterfield, the housekeeper
    who died at his property in 2018, out of almost $3.5 million, prosecutors say.
    The 22-count indictment unsealed by the U.S. attorney’s office for the District of South Carolina
    says that Murdaugh, 54, “engaged in three different schemes to obtain money and property
    from his personal injury clients” while he was a practicing attorney in Hampton, S.C.
    Murdaugh, who was sentenced to life in prison without parole in March for the 2021 murders of
    his wife, Maggie, 52, and son Paul, 22, has been charged with counts of conspiracy to commit
    wire fraud and bank fraud, and committing bank fraud, wire fraud and money laundering,
    according to prosecutors.
    Murdaugh admitted during his murder trial that he had created a web of financial crimes that
    bilked millions from vulnerable clients of his law practice, saying: “I believe the people I had stole
    money from for all of those years trusted me.” Murdaugh, the patriarch of a South Carolina legal
    dynasty whose case drew international attention, apologized several times during his testimony
    for swindling clients among whom were teenage girls and a quadriplegic man.
    “Trust in our legal system begins with trust in its lawyers,” U.S. Attorney Adair F. Boroughs said
    in a news release announcing the charges. “South Carolinians turn to lawyers when they are at
    their most vulnerable, and in our state, those who abuse the public’s trust and enrich themselves
    by fraud, theft and self-dealing will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”
    Dick Harpootlian and Jim Griffin, Murdaugh’s attorneys, said in a statement to The Washington
    Post that their client “has been cooperating with the United States Attorneys’ Office and federal
    agencies in their investigation of a broad range of activities.”
    “We anticipate that the charges brought today will be quickly resolved without a trial,” the
    attorneys said.
    If convicted of all of the federal charges, Murdaugh faces up to 150 years added on to his life
    sentence and fines up to $4.75 million.
    Meanwhile, Murdaugh is expected to be deposed in the wrongful-death lawsuit brought against
    him by the family of Mallory Beach, a 19-year-old who was killed in a 2019 drunken-boating
    accident involving Murdaugh’s boat and his late son, Paul Murdaugh. A South Carolina judge
    filed a consent order Monday “granting leave for parties to conduct the deposition” of Alex
    Page 3
    Murdaugh, which could take place virtually or in person. The lawsuit names other parties,
    including Murdaugh’s surviving son, Buster.
    Prosecutors in South Carolina say Murdaugh engaged in three separate schemes to bilk his
    clients of money and property.
    In the first, Murdaugh devised “a scheme to defraud and to obtain money by means of false
    pretenses” between at least September 2005 and September 2021, according to the indictment.
    He allegedly routed and redirected his clients’ settlement funds to personally enrich himself in
    several ways, including by sending settlement funds to his accounts without proper disclosure,
    and collecting attorney’s fees on fake or nonexistent annuities.
    In the second alleged scheme, from around July 2011 until at least October 2021, Murdaugh
    conspired with his banker, Russell Laffitte, to commit wire fraud and bank fraud, prosecutors say.
    Laffitte collected more than $350,000 in fees in his role as personal representative or conservator
    for numerous personal injury clients of Murdaugh’s.
    “As part of the scheme, the indictment alleges Murdaugh directed law firm employees to make
    settlement checks payable to ‘Palmetto State Bank.’ The checks were then delivered to Laffitte,
    whom Murdaugh directed to use the settlement funds for Murdaugh’s benefit,” prosecutors
    wrote. “The funds were used to pay off Murdaugh’s personal loans and for personal expenses
    and cash withdrawals.”
    Lafitte was convicted in November on six federal charges, including conspiracy to commit wire
    and bank fraud, and committing bank fraud and wire fraud. He is awaiting sentencing.
    In the third alleged scheme, prosecutors say Murdaugh set up a bank account presented as a
    legitimate corporation for structuring insurance settlements between May 2017 and July 2021.
    The indictment says Murdaugh funneled stolen personal injury settlements through an account
    named “fake Forge” to conceal his fraud efforts.
    It was during this scheme, prosecutors say, that Murdaugh defrauded Satterfield’s estate and his
    insurance carriers after she died. Murdaugh recommended that the housekeeper’s estate hire an
    attorney to represent the estate and file a claim against Murdaugh to collect from his
    homeowner’s insurance policies. Murdaugh’s insurance companies settled the estate’s claim for
    $505,000 and $3.8 million, the indictment says. Then, Murdaugh and the attorney allegedly
    “conspired to siphon settlement funds, disguised as ‘prosecution expenses,’ for their own
    personal enrichment.”
    “The indictment further alleges that Murdaugh directed the Beaufort attorney to draft checks
    totaling $3,483,431.95 made payable to ‘Forge,’” prosecutors say. “Murdaugh then deposited
    the checks into his ‘fake Forge’ account and used the funds for his own personal enrichment. The
    estate did not receive any of the settlement funds.”
    Eric S. Bland, the Satterfield family’s attorney, tweeted that the federal charges against
    Murdaugh amounted to “a great day for justice in South Carolina.”
    “While it is said that Lady Justice is blind, she is not a sucker,” he wrote. “Bottom Line — Cant
    run or hide from justice.”
    Page 4
    Murdaugh claimed during his trial that bad land deals and an addiction to opiate pills fueled a decade￾long cycle of borrowing and spending by him that battered his family’s finances. His attorneys
    have framed his alleged financial shadiness in recent court filings as being representative of “a bleak and
    dispiriting story of a man brought to his knees by a crippling drug addiction, who also had the financial
    means and knowledge to effect great financial harm upon others to feed that addiction.”
    Contracts are an important tool in businesses and are the foundation of a lawyer’s relationship with their
    clients. Contracts ensure that all parties understand and have confirmation of what they are agreeing to,
    and to ensure there is no room for misrepresentation. Additionally, because the terms are outlined
    clearly, there is legal accountability if a contract is not performed by one or more of the parties.
    Attorneys generally enter into contracts with each of their clients as a representative of their firm.
    Additionally, the attorneys also enter into contracts with their firms to agree to the terms of employment
    and the expectations of how their cases are to be handled and managed as a member of the firm. This
    was no different for Alex Murdaugh; he had a contractual obligation to each of his clients as well as his
    firm.
    The law firm that the prominent Murdaugh family helped start is now suing Alex Murdaugh.
    In court documents filed Tuesday in Colleton County, the PMPED law firm is suing Murdaugh for
    actual damages “together with punitive damages in an appropriate amount” after claiming
    Murdaugh used money from clients and the firm for his own personal use.
    A specific dollar amount was not mentioned.
    According to the court filing, Murdaugh was covertly stealing the funds and putting them into a
    Bank of America account in the name of “Alexander Murdaugh d/b/a Forge,” which was a
    fictitious entity.
    The lawsuit alleges Murdaugh put the account in that name to avoid detection, knowing the
    longstanding relationship the firm had with Forge Consulting LLC in Columbia.
    According to the court documents, the firm began investigating on September 2 after finding a
    suspicious check on Murdaugh’s desk.
    It was the following day that Murdaugh was confronted with the information PMPED learned,
    and he admitted to taking the funds. The lawsuit reads that Murdaugh was asked to resign, and
    he submitted his resignation that afternoon.
    PMPED says it has reimbursed all client trust accounts who have suffered a loss due to
    Murdaugh’s actions. But the firm says it may learn about additional losses.
    “As a result of Alex Murdaugh’s conduct in breach of the contract, PMPED has suffered
    damages,” the lawsuit reads. “These include but are not limited to monies paid by PMPED to
    Page 5
    protect clients’ interests and to fully discover the improper actions of the Defendant as well as
    any additional monies that may have to be paid in the future for Alex Murdaugh’s conduct.”
    Jim Griffin, one of Alex Murdaugh’s lawyers, responded to the lawsuit on Wednesday.
    “This is a very sad development,” he said. “Alex holds every member of the Peters, Murdaugh,
    Parker, Eltzroth, Detrick law firm in very high esteem. He has pledged his full cooperation to the
    firm.”
    As you can see Alex’s firm has now initiated action for his breach of contract to the firm which created
    significant liability for them to each of Murdaugh’s defrauded clients.
    Peters, Murdaugh, Parker, Eltzroth, and Detrick, PA (PMPED) was the law firm in which Murdaugh was a
    partner and his great grandfather founded. The firm was set up a Professional Association (PA) business
    structure. A Professional Association is a business entity that is available to organizations offering
    professional services like accounting and law firms. Professional Associations have all of the benefits of a
    Limited Liability Corporation (LLC), but it is taxed as a corporation.
    When a company has employees that act on their behalf or during the normal course of business to
    conduct their job duties, the employer becomes a respondeat superior. This doctrine states an
    employer is responsible for the actions of its employees performed during the course of their
    employment.
    This is a key reason for companies (or firms) to develop and implement policies and train employees on
    the expectations and requirements. It is unknown what, if any, policies existed at PMPED or if attorneys
    or employees received any training.
    Referenced Articles:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/05/24/alex-murdaugh-federal-charges-stealing-millions/
    https://www.greenvilleonline.com/story/news/2022/07/13/alex-murdaugh-news-officially-disbarred-sc￾supreme-court/10044376002/
    https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/06/us/alex-murdaugh-sued-former-law-firm/index.html
    https://www.wjcl.com/article/alex-murdaugh-pmped-lawsuit/37886606
    https://abc7chicago.com/alex-murdaugh-fraud-case-news/12938583/
    Page 1
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 13-1
    Page 2
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 13-2
    The Legal & Regulatory
    Environment of Business 19e
    Chapter 13
    Criminal Law and Business
    Pagnattaro Cahoy Magid Shedd
    13-2
    Page 3
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 13-3
    Learning Objectives
    • To recognize the basic terms and procedures
    relevant to criminal conduct
    • To explain Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment
    rights
    • To identify the elements of specific crimes
    • To understand the far-reaching impact of
    criminal behavior as the same acts can give
    rise to both civil and criminal liability
    Page 4
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 13-4
    Crimes
    • Wrongs against society
    – Criminal law punishes wrongdoers who affect the
    ownership of property
    – Federal and state penal codes define criminal acts
    and omissions
    • White-collar crime: Any illegal offense that
    occurs in a business or professional setting
    – Committed to harm the business or for personal
    gains
    Page 5
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 13-5
    Table 13.1 – Examples of White-Collar
    Crimes
    Page 6
    Copyright ©2022 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 13-6
    Felony
    Indictment
    Grand Jury
    Fine or
    Imprisonment
    Misdemeanor
    Information
    Gov’t Charge
    Fine Or
    Jail

    Still stressed from student homework?
    Get quality assistance from academic writers!

    Order your essay today and save 25% with the discount code LAVENDER