The assignment is related and is continuous to my assignment 1 & 2.
BUS5AP Analytics in Practice Semester 2 2019 Assignment 3 Report to Stakeholders Background and Situation Recall from Assignments 1 & 2 that you are progressing an idea on behalf of the Lord Mayor of Melbourne, Sally Capp . You are now to the point of being able to present your findings to the stakeholder group. The stakeholder group includes: • The Lord Mayor (the decision maker) • The CFO (who will be concerned around financial metrics and do -ability) • The CIO (who will be interested in the degree to which your solution impacts the IT infrastructure and/or data) • The Head of HR (who will be interested in how this solution impacts City of Melbourne staff) • The COO (who has to make it work… whatever it is) . Task You r task is two -fold: • present a 5 minute discussion (inclusive of a 1 minute Q&A) of the key points to the stakeholder group (or a proxy thereof). • submit a formal document (either as a written prose document or as a presentation). You can submit either your full work (if you have chosen a relatively small opportunity) or interim findings (if you have chosen a larger / more intensive opportunity). As a ge neral guide, your work should reflect approximately 80 hours of effort outside the classroom. Please reuse materials (as appropriate) from Assignments 1 & 2. Submission i. Please prepare the presentation materials and rehearse so that you are ready to present during the week 12 workshop ii. In addition, please formally submit your written presentation through the assignment submission portal by the due date iii. The formal presentation shou ld be approximately 1000 words (if in prose) or 5 – 20 pages (if in presentation) iv. Please ensure t hat your submission a ddresses a. the project management essentials ( objective , timeline, resource s, risks etc) b. data ethics considerations . If no data ethics issues, please state that. v. Please submit a. in a single PDF b. using a file name that includes your name and assignment number (for example “StuBlack_BUS5AP_Assignment 3”) c. with your name, assignment name and page numbers on each page M arking rubric (total of 30 marks, equivalent to 30% of the final mark) Criteria \ Grade D (50% to < 60%) C (60% to <69%) B (70%% to <79%) A (80% and above) Oral Presentation (10) Weak presentation. Audience confused. Time constraints not followed . Poor visualisation Moderate presentation , albeit missing significant elements that significantly reduce s the confidence of the stakeholders . Some visualisation, but not well done Good presentation with appropriate materials, but elements could be improved . Good visualisation of key elements Strong presentation, demonstrates good judgement in selecting issues to address and concisely addresses these issues, well – addressed questions, provides the audience with confidence . Strong visualisation Content (10 ) Does not demonstrate anywhere near 80 hours of effort Demonstrates less than 80 hours of effort, albeit with significant gaps in coverage Good result, demonstrates that 80 hours was invested. However, depth / breadth improvement opportunities exist Very solid result.
Demonstrates the full impact of 80 hours of input effort, and well balanced Written Presentation (10) Weak document. Audience confused. Moderate document , albeit missing significant elements that significantly reduces the confidence of the stakeholders (content, project management essentials, d ata ethics considerations ) Good document with appropriate materials, but elements could be improved Strong document , demonstrates good judgement in selecting issues to address and concisely addresses these issues, does a good job covering project management essential s and data ethics considerations) , provides the audience with confidence