People Are Vulnerable to the Tendency to Jump to Conclusions.
I will pay for the following article People Are Vulnerable to the Tendency to Jump to Conclusions. The work is to be 6 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.
I have proposed to carry out a research study that shall verify the hypothesis that a significant proportion of people are vulnerable to the tendency to jump to conclusions, further investigating the reasons for such partiality.Various studies have been conducted that support the thesis that people suffering from delusional disorders require less amount of information while making hasty decisions (Fine et al., 2007). Experiments have been carried out using beads task, mostly concluding that 50%–60% of clinical patients only request for 1 or 2 beads to make the final call on the contrary to the other 20%–30% in healthier participants (Moritz and Woodward, 2005).
Moreover, even psychosis-prone persons have occasionally demonstrated the JTC conditions when tested through beads experiments (Colbert & Peters, 2002). However, there have been varying views about the causes of these symptoms and there is still an ongoing debate in this regard. Most researchers blame induced anxiety to be the root cause of increased state paranoia and JTC in a majority of the cases. Past studies suggest that threat-related perceptions along with state anxiety are readily accepted by people who are more inclined to jump to conclusions.
Therefore, most of the results indicate delusional disorders to be more closely correlated to JTC conditions than schizophrenic effects (Peters et al., 2008). On the contrary, Hemsley suggested that irregularity of decision-making is a product of cognitive dysfunction that arises from schizophrenia (Hemsley, 2005). Another research shows that JTC is found mostly to be demonstrated by individuals that are suffering from psychosis (Broome et al., 2007) and also, as claimed by Van Dael, by people who are closely related or acquainted with such individuals (Van Dael et al., 2006). A study on reasoning explained that the normal state of reasoning involves accepting those taken-for-granted assumptions subconsciously that don’t .occur to people explicitly and are considered by them to be unworthy of consideration.
Thus, on basis of these, such individuals make erroneous judgments by skipping some essential intermediate steps of the decision-making process.