Marking Criteria

ACCY200, Autumn 2021, Assessment Task 3: Marking Criteria
Grade
Awarded
Demonstrates
Excellent (Mark range: 8.5 – 10)
• Clearly identifies a recent issue in relation to chosen accounting standard
• Logically and coherently explains how this is an issue within an accounting context
• Specifically discusses how the accounting standard does or does not resolve the issue
• Discusses specific parts of the accounting standard that are relevant
• Informed discussion – well researched and cites references
• Displays academic writing style, clear expression, effective use of paragraphs, correct spelling, grammar, punctuation and sentence
construction
• Applies Harvard Referencing Method in the content and in reference list
• Manages response within the limits set for length, style and format.
Good (Mark range: 7 – 8)
• Clearly identifies a recent issue in relation to chosen accounting standard
• Explains how this is an issue within an accounting context
• Broadly discusses how the accounting standard does and/or does not resolve the issue
• Discusses the accounting standard generally; or, specifically but may not reveal a full understanding
• Informed discussion – some research evident with occasional citing of references
• Displays academic writing style, with one or two areas (clear expression, use of paragraphs, spelling, grammar, punctuation and
sentence construction) needing further development
• Applies Harvard Referencing Method in the content and in reference list
• Manages response within most (or all) of the limits set for length, style and format
Satisfactory (Mark range: 5 – 6.5)
• Discusses or lists more than one issue related to the chosen accounting standard; and/or does not offer a clear identification of one
issue related to the chosen accounting standard; and/or too much discussion of the issue in general
• Displays some problems with logic and coherency in explanation
• Discusses generally how the chosen accounting standard is linked to the issue but may not clearly identify whether the standard
resolves the issue; and/or does not discuss an issue within the accounting context
• Discusses generally the accounting standard but may not specifically identify parts of the standard that are relevant to the issue
• Lacks Informed discussion – one or two references are cited; and/or the references are not used logically to make a clear point
Grade
Awarded
Demonstrates
• Displays a writing style that needs further development of a few areas in: academic style, expression, use of paragraphs, spelling,
grammar, punctuation and sentence construction.
• Applies referencing method that may not correctly adhere to Harvard Referencing Method
• Manages response within some (or all) of the limits set for length, style and format.
Fair (Mark range: 4 – 4.5)
• Discusses an issue, identifies the accounting standard, but has not successfully made the link between the two.
• Displays problems with logic and coherency in explanation, with minor parts offering some meaning.
• Discusses some of the issue within the accounting context
• Lacks Informed discussion – one or two references are cited; and/or the references are not used logically to make a clear point
• Displays a writing style that makes readability difficult in some or many parts. Further development needed in most areas of
academic style, expression, use of paragraphs, spelling, grammar, punctuation and sentence construction.
• Problems in applying a method of referencing: does not correctly adhere to Harvard Referencing Method or any method, and/or
poorly referenced content where referencing should have been applied.
• Manages response without much consideration of set limits, or some of the limits set for length, style and format are met
Unsatisfactory (Mark range: 0 – 3.5)
• Discusses broad issues and/or broad area of accounting; may also fail to identify the accounting standard.
• Displays mostly confusion and misunderstanding of the issue in relation to the accounting standard; and problems with logic and
coherency in explanation.
• Discusses mostly (or entirely) without attention to accounting context
• Lacks Informed discussion – one or two references are cited but with no clear/logical point.
• Displays a writing style that makes readability difficult in most parts. Further development needed in all areas of academic style,
expression, use of paragraphs, spelling, grammar, punctuation and sentence construction.
• Problems in applying a method of referencing: does not correctly adhere to Harvard Referencing Method or any method, and/or
poorly referenced content where referencing should have been applied.
• Manages response without consideration of set limits (eg, too short in length, incorrect formatting)

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Marking Criteria
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay
Calculate your order
Pages (275 words)
Standard price: $0.00
Client Reviews
4.9
Sitejabber
4.6
Trustpilot
4.8
Our Guarantees
100% Confidentiality
Information about customers is confidential and never disclosed to third parties.
Original Writing
We complete all papers from scratch. You can get a plagiarism report.
Timely Delivery
No missed deadlines – 97% of assignments are completed in time.
Money Back
If you're confident that a writer didn't follow your order details, ask for a refund.

Calculate the price of your order

You will get a personal manager and a discount.
We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00
Power up Your Academic Success with the
Team of Professionals. We’ve Got Your Back.
Power up Your Study Success with Experts We’ve Got Your Back.
error: Content is protected !!
Live Chat+1(978) 822-0999EmailWhatsApp

Order your essay today and save 20% with the discount code GOODESSAY