Failing to Obtain Desired Levels of Success with Cooperative Strategies

Ch apte r 9. Mini -Case

Failing to Obtain Desired Levels of Success with Cooperative Strategies

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Failing to Obtain Desired Levels of Success with Cooperative Strategies
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Th e co mplex ity assoc iated with mos t coope rative strateg ies inc rease s the difficu lty of

success fully us ing the m. One caus e of this co mplex ity is the fac t tha t often , firms co llabo rating

on ce rtain projec ts are simultaneous ly co mpe ting with eac h othe r as well. As exp laine d ea rlier,

this rea lity desc ribe s the relationsh ip be twee n Cisc o an d IBM as well as thos e ex isting with

airline co mpan ies tha t hav e joine d allianc e ne tworks (suc h as Star, One world, an d Sky Tea m).

Ano the r co mplica tion is tha t firms so metimes form a pa rtne rsh ip with a co mpan y tha t is itse lf a

co llabo ration be twee n othe r co mpan ies . Fo r exa mple, Fo rd Motor Compan y formed a joint

ven ture with ca rbo n manu fac turer DowAksa , a firm tha t is a joint ven ture organ ize d by Dow

Che mica l Compan y an d Istanbu l-base d Aks a Ak rilik Kimya Sanay ii A.S. Th e pu rpos e of the

Fo rd/DowAks a co llabo ration is to find way s to deve lop cheape r grade s of ca rbo n fibe r

co mponen ts tha t ca n be integ rated into Fo rd’s au tomob iles an d trucks . Becaus e it is muc h ligh ter

tha n stee l, ca rbo n fibe r he lps au to manu fac turers reduc e the weigh t of the ir produc ts, which in

turn fac ilit ates the ir efforts to inc reas e produc ts’ ga s mileage . W e se e the n tha t, for multiple

reasons , the co mplex ities of coope rative strateg ies inc reas e the cha lleng e of effec tive ly

implemen ting the m an d may con tribu te to allianc e failure.

Redbo x an d Verizo n termina ted the ir relationsh ip tha t was origina lly deve lope d to beco me the

strea ming subsc ription co mponen ts of Redbox ’s ren tal bus ines s after on ly two yea rs. (Outerwall

founde d Redbo x in pa rtne rsh ip with McDona ld’s Ven tures , LL C. McDona ld’s hope d to distribu te

DVDs throug h ren tal kiosk s at its res tau ran ts as a mean s of attrac ting cus tomers an d prov iding

the m with a un iqu e se rvice .) Compe ting aga ins t the like s of Netfli x an d Hulu Plus , Redbox ’s

strea ming se rvice failed to attrac t a su fficien t nu mbe r of cus tomers, pe rhap s in pa rt becaus e it

was ab le to strea m to cus tomers on ly items tha t its compe titors were also strea ming . Unlike

Netfli x an d Hulu Plus , Redbo x was no t deve lop ing its own origina l con ten t as a mean s of crea ting

un iqu e va lue for cus tomers. Becaus e the se rvice mad e ava ilab le throug h the Redbo x an d

Verizo n co llabo ration was los ing mone y an d was no t ga ining a su fficien t nu mbe r of subsc ribe rs,

the pa rtne rs chos e to termina te the ir relationsh ip.

Carefully execu ting the ope rationa l de tails of a planne d coope rative strateg y is founda tiona l to its

pe rformanc e an d influence s if it will succee d or fail. In mid-201 5 for exa mple, First So lar, Inc . an d

SunPo wer Corpo ration , the two larges t U.S. so lar-pane l manu fac turers, were in the plann ing

stage s to form a joint ven ture tha t wou ld own an d ope rate so me of the firms’ projec ts. Th e

propose d pa rtne rs be lieve d tha t the co llabo ration wou ld crea te va lue by co mbining “SunPo wer’s po lys ilico n techno log y with First So lar’s thin-film pane ls.” Howeve r, SunPo wer reco rde d a los s in

the first qua rter of 2015 , pa rtly becaus e of cos ts it was incu rring to struc ture the propose d

relationsh ip with First So lar. Th is de mons trates the impo rtanc e of iden tifying efficien t as well as

effec tive way s to struc ture a propose d co llabo ration be twee n co mpan ies as a mean s of

inc reas ing the like lihoo d of ope rationa l success .

Ea rlier, we no ted tha t MillerCoo rs, the joint ven ture formed be twee n Molso n Coo rs an d

SAB Miller, is encoun tering difficu lties . So me ana lys ts be liev e tha t a reaso n for this is tha t, while

the pa rtne rsh ip ha d bee n ve ry success ful du ring its first six yea rs in terms of subs tan tially

reduc ing cos ts by crea ting econo mies of sca le, it ha d failed to inc reas e the marke t sha res he ld

by two of its impo rtan t produc ts, Miller Lite an d Coo rs Ligh t. Th e situa tion with the MillerCoo rs

pa rtne rsh ip sugges ts tha t long -term coope rative strateg y succes s resu lts whe n pa rtne rs find

un iqu e way s to crea te va lue for cus tomers in add ition to find ing way s to reduc e ope rating cos ts.

Sou rces : M. Armen tal, 2015 , SunPo wer swing s to los s on cos ts related to planne d joint ven ture,

W all Stree t Jou rna l Online , ww m, Ap ril 30 ; D. Harris, 2015 , China joint ven tures : How

no t to ge t bu rned , Abov e the La w, ww w.above the m, Feb rua ry 9; Molso n Coo rs, U.S. joint

ven ture MillerCoo rs fac ing stiff cha llenges , W all Stree t Jou rna l Online , ww m, May 7; J. D.

Stoll, 2015 , Fo rd to deve lop ca rbon -fibe r material for ca rs, W all Stree t Jou rna l Online ,

ww m, Ap ril 17 ; P. E. Fa rrell, 2014 , Th e 7 dead ly sins of joint ven tures , En trep reneu r,

ww w.en trep reneu m, Sep tembe r 2; Q. Plumm er, 2014 , Redbo x ins tan t will be killed Oct. 7: A

failed joint ven ture, Tec h Times , ww times .co m, Octobe r 6.

Cas e Discuss ion Ques tion s

1. W ha t are so me of the major co mplex ities encoun tered in deve lop ing coope rative strateg ies

suc h as strateg ic alliance s an d joint ven tures ?

2. W ha t role doe s co mpe titi on from riva ls play in the even tua l succes s of coope rative strateg ies ?

Pleas e exp lain.

3. W ha t cos ts are incu rred in deve lop ing strateg ic alliances ? How ca n thes e cos ts be managed ?

4. Sh ou ld cos t minimiza tion or oppo rtun ity max imiza tion be the primary goa l of a coope rative

strategy ? Can bo th be ach ieve d simultaneous ly? W hy or why not?


Calculate the price of your paper

Total price:$26
Our features

We've got everything to become your favourite writing service

Order your assignment today!
Ace that class.

Order your paper
Live Chat+1(978) 822-0999EmailWhatsApp