Create a Training Presentation Select one of the following articles
This text is an abridged excerpt from chapters \f and 2 of Case Studies on Diversity and Social Justice \fducation, reproduced here \bith permission of Routledge. CASE STUDIES ON Diversity & Social Justice E d u c ati o n BY PAUL C. G\fRSKI & SEEMA G. P\fTHINI SAMANTHA, A VIVACIOUS seventh grader at Hillside School, a middle school in the predominantly low-in – come mountainous outskirts of north- ern Virginia, loves science class. By all apparent accounts, Samantha has a gift for the sciences, too. She aces all of her quizzes and tests and regularly helps classmates who are struggling with experiments. This makes it particularly diffi- cult for Ms. Grady to understand why Samantha rarely turns in her sci – ence homework. Wondering whether there was an issue at home, Ms. Grady has touched base several times with her colleagues who have Samantha’s younger siblings in their classes to see whether they were noticing similar patterns. To the contrary, she learned that her younger siblings always turn in their homework. Ms. Grady has reached out to Samantha every way she knows how, from pleading with her to offering to give her more advanced work that might engage her in new ways. On sev – eral occasions she has asked Samantha why she rarely turns in her homework. “It’s nothing,” Samantha typically responds. “I’ll do it next time. I promise.” Regardless of how often she calls Samantha’s parents, nobody answers.
Imagine how successful Samantha could be if only her parents cared enough to support her education, Ms. Grady has often thought to herself. As a conscientious teacher, Ms. Grady wants to support Samantha. On the other hand, she has roomfuls of other students who also need her atten – tion. And, when it comes down to it, Ms.
Grady’s grading policy is clear: stu- dents are allowed to turn in one home- work assignment one day late without 44 TEACHING TOLERANCE penalty—she calls this her “life hap- pens” rule; but in every other instance, failure to turn in homework results in a grade of “0” for that assignment. One day after school Ms. Grady approaches Mr. Burns, a social studies teacher at Hillside who had taken a par – ticular interest in Samantha during the previous academic year. “I know,” Mr. Burns says. “Brilliant young woman. I had the same experi- ence with her. I didn’t know what to think until I decided to pa y her fam- ily a visit at home.” Having grown up in the area and at tended Hillside as a low-income student, Mr. Burns bristled at some of his colleagues’ deficit-laden perceptions of the local community. It never occurred to Ms. Grady to visit Samantha’s home. “Wow!” she responds, taken aback by her col – league’s “direct action” approach to student success. “What did you learn?” “A lot,” he answers, explaining that Samantha’s father finally found a steady job four months after the local mill shut down. As she has done for years, Samantha’s mother continues to piece together multiple jobs. “She usually sneaks in the door around 11 p.m., an hour or so after her husband, trying not to wake the kids,” Mr. Burns explains. “From the moment she gets home from school until her dad returns from work, she’s babysitting Francis and Kevin, her younger siblings. She’s busy taking them to the playground, cook – ing them dinner, helping them with their homework.” “Well,” Ms. Grady reflects, “that explains why her siblings’ homework is always in on time and how well Samantha does helping her classmates with their work.” “Now all I have to do is figure out what to do about Samantha’s grade.
And I wonder how many of my other students are in similar situations,” Ms.
Grady says. There exists no magic formula for solving the conundrum in which Ms.
Grady finds herself. This is why, in our estimation, we must develop and hone the sorts of competencies that help us FALL 2014 45 “From the moment she gets home from school until her dad returns from work, she’s babysitting Francis and Kevin, her younger siblings.
She’s busy taking them to the playground, cooking them dinner, helping them with their homework.” to make sense out of real-life messiness.
Otherwise, we risk allowing ourselves to be swayed by popular mythology (“poor people do not care enough about their children’s education”). We risk respond- ing without a contoured understanding for why certain conditions exist in our classrooms and schools. We have the power to strengthen our abilities to create equitable learn- ing environments and to maintain high expectations for all students by consid – ering contextual factors in addition to the everyday practicalities of our work as we shape our professional practice.
The Case Method One tool—and, in our experience, a par – ticularly effective one—for strengthen- ing those abilities is what is commonly called the “case method.” The premise of the case method is that by analyz- ing real-life scenarios based on actual events, such as the situation involving Samantha and Ms. Grady, we can prac- tice applying theoretical ideas (such as educational equity) to on-the-ground professional practice.* Our process for analyzing educational cases is comprised of seven steps. The steps are accumulative, building steadily and holistically toward a set of informed, mindful responses to often complex classroom and school situations. IDENTIFY THE PROBLEM OR PROBLEMS POSED BY THE CASE Begin by naming the challenges or problems (or potential problems) that are explicit and immediately apparent to you.
Once you have a grasp of those more obvious dynamics, try to dig a little deeper. Look for less explicit, not-so -ob vious exam- ples of existing or potential bias, inequity, interpersonal ten- sions, stereotypes, prejudices, or assumptions. What does the case tell us about school or classroom policy, about instructional prac – tices or curricula, about individuals’ attitudes that might hint at some – thing deeper than those surface-level biases and inequities?
TAKE STOCK OF \fARYING PERSPECTI\fES Our case has at least a couple of obvious stakeholders. Our first task, then, for Step 2 is, as best we can, to walk in Ms.
Grady and Samantha’s shoes. How might they, given who they are in relation to one another, be experiencing the situation? Complicating matters, despite being at the center of the scenario, Samantha and Ms. Grady are only two of many affected parties. Samantha’s parents, whose other two children, Frances and Kevin, also attend the school and in the future might even have Ms. Grady as a teacher, are involved. Then there are Samantha’s class- mates, the “bystanders.” How might Ms. Grady’s decisions affect other students who are from families in poverty? CONSIDER POSSIBLE CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES Our next task is to imagine the potential challenges and opportu – nities presented by the case. Start with the individuals involved.
We might surmise that Ms. Grady has an opportunity to develop a deeper understanding of low-income students—of both the hurdles they might face and the resiliencies they demonstrate. Of course, she also faces a number of challenges, not least of which is overcoming her own biases. What sorts of opportunities and challenges does the case present for Samantha? For her classmates?
We also want to consider the institutional challenges and opportu- nities. We might assume, by way of challenges, that Ms. Grady might not get a tremendous amount of support if she chose to enact a home- work policy that did not conform to those of her colleagues. An institu – tional opportunity, on the other hand, might be the chance to collabo- rate toward more equitable school-wide policies and practices in order to more effectively engage low-income students and families.
IMAGINE EQUITABLE OUTCOMES [W]e turn, in Step 4, to imagining what a fair and equitable resolution to the situation might look like. This is a critical step, as Steps 5 through 7 are designed to facilitate the process of working toward the outcomes we define in Step 4. First, it’s important to distinguish equitable outcomes STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 * Darling-Hammond, L. (2006) Powerful Teacher Education: Lessons from Exemplary Programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
46 TEACHING TOLERANCE from equal outcomes. Equality, as we see it, connotes sameness. Equity, on the other hand, connotes fairness. Equity takes context into account. Second, remember to think both immediate term and long term. What can be resolved right now, on the spot, and what will equity look like once it is resolved? You might decide, for example, that Ms. Grady needs to find a different strategy right now to communicate with Samantha.
Perhaps an equitable outcome would be professional development on socioeconomic issues for the teachers at Samantha’s school or a strengthened relationship between Ms. Grady and Samantha’s parents. Finally, be specific. Identify very specific, on-the-ground outcomes. How, specifically, will things be different in that classroom and school if we commit to resolving the issue and all its complexities equitably?
BRAINSTORM IMMEDIATE\bTERM RESPONSES Now that you have some equitable outcomes in mind, it is time to begin brainstorming strategies to get us there. What are some of the things you might do right now, if you were in Ms. Grady’s shoes, to achieve those outcomes? This is a brain – storm, remember, so do not overthink. All we are doing here is making a list. It’s an informed list, based on all the work we have been doing in the previous steps. But it is still just a list.
BRAINSTORM LONGER\bTERM POLICY AND PRACTICE ADJUSTMENTS In Step 6 we turn to longer-term strategies, often for more substantive change. This is where we might brainstorm ways to bolster awareness about the sorts of challenges Samantha faces throughout the school, if that is one of our equitable outcomes. It is where we focus on things such as institu – tional culture, school-wide practices, or even district policy, if we believe they need to be altered in order to achieve our equita – ble outcomes.
Here, again, we’re brainstorming. Try not to self-censor. Just focus on recording whatever ideas come to mind based on Steps 1 through 5. CRAFT A PLAN OF ACTION During this, the final step, we craft our brainstorms into a set of specific actions that will result in the equitable outcomes we imagined in Step 5. How would you respond in order to ensure, to the best of your knowledge and power, equity for everybody involved? Toolkit Apply the seven-step case method to another case—or to a case of your own.
visit » tolerance.org/case-studies A Few Final Thoughts We recognize, of course, that in the heat of the moment we do not always have time to sit down and think through the seven steps of a case analysis process.
The point is not to memorize these steps. Instead, the idea is to use them to practice our skills by reflecting on classroom situations through a diver – sity and social justice lens. Practice enough, and that view will become sec – ond nature. STEP 5 STEP 6 STEP 7 FALL 2014 4\f We have the power to create equitable learning environments and to maintain high expectations for all students by considering contextual factors.