Choose at least two of the ten theorists we have discussed this semester.

Assessment Rubric for Final Essay

	Exemplary 4 points	Accomplished 3 points	Developing  2 points	Beginning 1 point
Theoretical Content	Demonstratessolid understanding ofthe major themes byusing readings and lectures to define concepts.Arguments are placed within the broad discussions outlined in the course.	Concepts are defined, but the author does notdemonstrate a solidunderstanding of the majorthemes relevant to the argument.	Concepts are poorlydefined. Course readings were mentioned but with little demonstration of a solid understanding.	Concepts are left undefined.Paper mentionscourse readings,but there is littledemonstration ofunderstanding.
Logic and Coherence	Theories and central concepts are clearly presented. Arguments are supported with three or more relevant details and information. Uses key quotations from the readings.	Theories and central concepts are presented correctly. Arguments are supported with at least two relevant information. Use some quotations from the readings.	Theories and central concepts are presented but not discussed. Limited use of primary and/or secondary readings.	Theories and central concepts are present incorrectly, or does not use quotations from primary readings or does not do so effectively. Details are missing, information is unclear. Limited use of primary or secondary readings to support the idea.
Application of Theories and Concepts	Theories were utilized effectively to make sense of the arguments. Conclusions are presented with appropriate evidence. Clearly and creatively compares and contrasts the various theorists.	Adequately utilize theory to make sense of the case in a thoughtful manner. Conclusions are support with evidences. Adequately compares and/or contrasts the various theorists.	Limited utilization of theory to make sense of their arguments. Conclusions are supported with limited evidence. Inadequately compares and/or contrasts the various theorists.	No theory is selected, described, or used effectively. No compare and contrast was done of the theories.
Quality of Writing	Clear organization which includes an introduction, and transition sentences toconnect major ideas, andconclusion. There are few and/or grammatical or spelling errors. Ideas and evidence are correctly cited.	Clear organization, withintroduction, transitions and conclusion. There areseveral grammatical and/orspelling errors. Ideas andevidence are correctly cited.	Organization isunclear or withoutnecessary components.Significant grammatical and/or spelling errors .Ideas and evidence not arecorrectly cited.	Little discernableorganization.More than three significantgrammar andspelling errors.Ideas andevidence are notcorrectly cited, ornot cited at all.