Assessment Description

5. Excellent

84 points

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Assessment Description
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

A comparison of the views of Aristotle and Descartes on the relationship between body and mind/soul is clearly presented. The comparison contains rich detail and is discerning. Research is from scholarly, and original, and/or highly respected, current sources.

4. Good

76.44 points

A comparison of the views of Aristotle and Descartes on the relationship between body and mind/soul is clearly presented. The comparison is thorough and detailed. Research is from scholarly sources. Most are authoritative but some may be outdated.

3. Satisfactory

68.88 points

A comparison of the views of Aristotle and Descartes on the relationship between body and mind/soul is present but explanation is cursory and lacks depth.

2. Less than Satisfactory

61.32 points

A comparison of the views of Aristotle and Descartes on the relationship between body and mind/soul in the Golden Age of Greek philosophy is present but incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A comparison of the views of Aristotle and Descartes on the relationship between body and mind/soul is either not present or not evident to the reader.

Contrast the Nature of Introspection From the Vantage Points of Titchener, Comte, and Kant

84 points

Criteria Description

Contrast the Nature of Introspection From the Vantage Points of Titchener, Comte, and Kant

5. Excellent

84 points

A contrast of the nature of introspection from the vantage points of Titchener, Comte, and Kant is clearly presented. The comparison contains rich detail and is discerning. Research is from scholarly, and original, and/or highly respected, current sources.

4. Good

76.44 points

A contrast of the nature of introspection from the vantage points of Titchener, Comte, and Kant is clearly presented. The comparison is thorough and detailed. Research is from scholarly sources. Most are authoritative but some may be outdated.

3. Satisfactory

68.88 points

A contrast of the nature of introspection from the vantage points of Titchener, Comte, and Kant is present but explanation is cursory and lacks depth.

2. Less than Satisfactory

61.32 points

A contrast of the nature of introspection from the vantage points of Titchener, Comte, and Kant is present but incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A contrast of the nature of introspection from the vantage points of Titchener, Comte, and Kant is either not present or not evident to the reader.

Synthesis and Argument

24 points

Criteria Description

Synthesis and Argument

5. Excellent

24 points

Synthesis of source information is present and scholarly. Argument is clear and convincing presenting a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4. Good

21.84 points

Synthesis of source information is present and meaningful. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. Satisfactory

19.68 points

Synthesis of source information is present, but pedantic. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. Less than Satisfactory

17.52 points

Synthesis of source information is attempted, but is not successful. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

No synthesis of source information is evident. Statement of purpose is not followed to a justifiable conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses non-credible sources.

Thesis Development and Purpose

24 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. Excellent

24 points

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and comprehensive; the essence of the paper is contained within the thesis.

4. Good

21.84 points

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. Satisfactory

19.68 points

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. Less than Satisfactory

17.52 points

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Mechanics of Writing

12 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing

5. Excellent

12 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

10.92 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

3. Satisfactory

9.84 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

2. Less than Satisfactory

8.76 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

APA Format

12 points

Criteria Description

APA Format

5. Excellent

12 points

The document is correctly formatted to publication standards. All research presented is scholarly, topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

4. Good

10.92 points

Required format is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Scholarly research accounts for the majority of sources presented and is topic-related and obtained from reputable professional sources. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.

3. Satisfactory

9.84 points

Required correctly format is used, although some minor errors may be present. Scholarly research sources are present and topic-related, but the source and quality of some references is questionable. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

2. Less than Satisfactory

8.76 points

Required format is attempted, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Some included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Required format is rarely followed correctly. An appropriate number of topic-related scholarly research sources and related in-text citations is not present. No reference page is included. No citations are used.

Calculate your order
Pages (275 words)
Standard price: $0.00
Client Reviews
4.9
Sitejabber
4.6
Trustpilot
4.8
Our Guarantees
100% Confidentiality
Information about customers is confidential and never disclosed to third parties.
Original Writing
We complete all papers from scratch. You can get a plagiarism report.
Timely Delivery
No missed deadlines – 97% of assignments are completed in time.
Money Back
If you're confident that a writer didn't follow your order details, ask for a refund.

Calculate the price of your order

You will get a personal manager and a discount.
We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00
Power up Your Academic Success with the
Team of Professionals. We’ve Got Your Back.
Power up Your Study Success with Experts We’ve Got Your Back.
error: Content is protected !!
Live Chat+1(978) 822-0999EmailWhatsApp

Order your essay today and save 20% with the discount code GOODESSAY